Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Wikipedia a la luna/Votación

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikipedia to the Moon/Voting and the translation is 60% complete.
Esta page se mantiene por un interés histórico. Cualquier política mencionada podría estar obsoleta. Si deseas revivir este tema, puedes usar la página de discusión o añadir un tema en el foro de la comunidad.
Página principal Paso 1: escenarios Paso 2: votación Paso 3: trabajo Paso 4: envolver Acerca de Preguntas frecuentes
hecho hecho hecho hecho

Este es el lugar para votar por la mejor forma de seleccionar y organizar contenido para Wikipedia a la luna. La discusión y desarrollo de los escenarios entre los que se puede escoger aquí está disponible en la página de la fase 1: escenarios. La redacción de los escenario está completa y a continuación puedes encontrar una versión resumida para el proceso de votación. ¡La recepción de votos está abierta hasta el 24 de junio de 2016!

¿Cómo votar?

Todos pueden votar, sin importar el nivel de acceso o los permisos. Por favor inicia sesión para votar o crea una cuenta. Los votos emitidos por direcciones IP no serán contabilizados.

  • Tienes un voto por cada escenario. No más. Puedes usar todos, si quieres, pero no es obligatorio.
  • Solo un voto por escenario
  • Los votos son solamente a favor, no hay votos en contra. Puedes estar a favor de varios escenarios.

¿Cómo se interpretará el resultado?

  • El escenario con el mayor número de votos gana.
  • Es una voto de pluralidad (también llamado "mayoría relativa"), lo cual quiere decir que el escenario con el mayor número de votos gana (los porcentajes no importan, solo el número de votos).
  • Hay 10 escenarios por los cuales puedes votar. 9 de ellos son sugerencias para cómo utilizar el disco duro como comunidad global. Pero el último escenario es básicamente un voto en contra de todo el proceso. Sugiere quitar la comunidad global del proyecto.

Vota aquí

Let's work on: a Wikipedia canon

Unos escenarios (ve p.e. "Agnóstico de lengua" y "Todos los artículos de alta importancia de todas las Wikipedias") parecen ser más o menos versiones del escenario del canon, el cual fue uno de las primeras tres sugerencias. La idea principal es seleccionar un conjunto de artículos representativos de la enciclopedia según los asuntos tratados y no la lengua. Primero, habría que determinar cuáles son los artículos y luego traducirlos a todas las lenguas posible. Un asunto crucial para cualquier de los escenarios de canon es qué criterios usamos para seleccionar los artículos.

Idea general: "En la literatura, un canon comprende un conjunto de obras que son consideradas como una especie de estándar o representación oficial de algo. No hay un canon global de los artículos de Wikipedia más importantes ni nada similar. Sin embargo, en muchos idiomas hay listas de artículos de Wikipedia que las personas sugieren que todas las Wikipedias deban tener. En este escenario todas las comunidades lingüísticas serían invitadas a discutir y ponerse de acuerdo sobre un solo canon de Wikipedia." Véase toda la discusión aquí!, Escenario: idioma agnóstico, Escenario: importancia superior­, escenario Space4all

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: a Wikipedia canon

  1. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. --Mysteriumen (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --Gerrit (talk) 12:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. --NaBUru38 (talk)
  11. --Eritain (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. --Tonystewart14 (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. --Arussom (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: TOP30 lists

Esto es algo así como una idea de canon "invertido", en el que no habría una lista de artículos que representen a todas las comunidades de Wikipedia. En cambio, cualquier comunidad de idioma tendría la posibilidad de enviar su propia lista de 30 artículos más importantes.

Idea general: "Mientras que un canon Wikipedia representaría una resolución de una comunidad global, las casi 300 versiones lingüísticas de Wikipedia representan una amplia variedad de cultura y conocimiento. En este escenario, se invitará a todas las versiones lingüísticas de Wikipedia para discutir y seleccionar su propio Top 30 de los artículos. Todas las selecciones de los mejores 30 de todas las versiones lingüísticas que participan entonces serían recogidos e incluidos en la carga útil de Wikipedia." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: TOP30 lists

  1. -- Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --Maria.martelli (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)--[reply ]
  3. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. José Luiz talk 21:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. --Postcrosser (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Waters.Justin (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. AveroXY (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. --Zabia (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. --Franco3450 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. --Carnildo (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. --Golan's mom (talk) 05:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. --Joalpe (talk) 01:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. --Sthelen.aqua (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. --Dimi z (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. -- Chickadee46 (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. — Yerpo Eh? 17:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. --Filipinayzd (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: a nominated items list

La tercera de las sugerencias iniciales describe una lista abierta, los cuales puede ser llenada con una sugerencia por cuenta registrada, sin importar idioma u otras barreras.

Idea general: "One account, one vote. In this scenario, every Wikipedian could add one list item and then sign their own suggestion. This could be Wikipedia articles (regardless of language), an image, or any other media item. No restrictions, except that you can only name one list item. The items of the whole list go to space." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

Discussion_Scenario_.23List:

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: a nominated items list

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --Golan's mom (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. --Bastenbas (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. Irn (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --Carlsrator (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. --DS-fax 17:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: Taking "Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon" to the moon!

This new scenario suggests picking just one article, i. e. the article about the Moon itself – in all available languages.

Idea general:" القمر, آی, ചന്ദ്രൻ, चंद्र, Mặt Trăng y los artículos sobre la luna en muchos otros idiomas se ofrecen. Vamos a enviar a todos ellos allí. Este podría ser parte de algunos de los otros escenarios. Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: Taking "Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon/ਚੰਦਰਮਾ" to the moon!

  1. Almafeta (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --Liridon (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. Seb az86556 (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. --స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. Michaelpires (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. --valepert (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. --Barbaking (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. --Golan's mom (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. --Winstonza (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. --Mickey83 (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. TOW talk 08:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. --Postcrosser (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. -- HvW (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  29. -Nyiffi (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  30. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Though I dont like the part about "picking just one article". The Moon articles won't fill the disc, so this should be combined with other scenarios.[reply ]
  31. --CristianCantoro (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  32. --Zabia (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  33. -- ONUnicorn (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  34. --YjM (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  35. -- Jonathunder (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  36. --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  37. --Khutuck (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  38. -- Bora (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  39. -- YenilenebilirAdam MESAJ 16:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  40. Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  41. --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  42. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  43. Popo le Chien (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  44. Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer 19:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC) It would be our Rosetta Stone[reply ]
  45. Olsi (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  46. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  47. --e.c. 23:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: a global editathon on Astronomy

This one suggests to hold a month-long Astronomy editathon. It would be virtual, meaning that it would take place online and anywhere in the world. Participants would be asked to contribute astronomy-related articles.

Idea general: "Hold an online edith week or month in which people write about Astronomy. Every article gets its author a ticket. At the end we draw a dozen people who can select an article to go to space." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: a global editathon on Astronomy

  1. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. --Mickey83 (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. -- Tanweer (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. ~ Moheen (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer 19:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Featured articles are at the core of another draft idea. It proposes to make a selection from this or similar kinds of distinguished articles across languages.

Idea general: "Let's send up the best of the best. All featured articles and lists on all Wikipedias. This would create a strong incentive for people to bring their favorite topics up to featured status. Imagine the kind of public relations this initiative would get: "Wikipedia community sends the best it has to offer to the moon"." Ve discusión llena aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

  1. --AzorAhai (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --JTCEPB (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. --Liridon (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. --Arian Talk 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --MrBn (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. NMaia (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. -- Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. GrandCelinien (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. Tetraktys (talk) 23:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. --Gts-tg (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. Michaelpires (talk) 02:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 05:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. Like tears in rain (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. Murbaut (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. --Bspf (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. --Cavaliere grande (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. --Lotus 50 (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. --g (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. --Coolland (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. --Titou (talk 11:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. --Winter eu 11:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  29. --Marica Massaro (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  30. --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Assuming that the number is ~40,000, the rest goes to the next place, third place, etc. I would like to see combinations of proposals.[reply ]
  31. --Winstonza (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  32. -- Irn (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  33. Mathanaharan (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  34. José Luiz talk 20:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  35. Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  36. --Yiyi (talk) 23:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  37. Jopparn (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  38. — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  39. --Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  40. --Ανώνυμος Βικιπαιδιστής (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  41. --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  42. ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  43. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  44. --Zamaster4536 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  45. --Ghilt (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  46. --Gerrit (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  47. --Fanfwah (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  48. --Syced (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  49. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  50. Braveheart (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  51. --Cruifer (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  52. --Nahum (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  53. --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  54. -Nyiffi (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  55. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  56. -- CreativeC38 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  57. --Zzyzx (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  58. -- Zabia (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  59. — Antimuonium U wanna talk? 18:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  60. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  61. --Soul Train (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  62. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  63. --Moony22 (talk) 21:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  64. --Frettie (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  65. --Carnildo (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  66. --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  67. -- Bora (talk) 23:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  68. --Eritain (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  69. --Golan's mom (talk) 05:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  70. --Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  71. --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  72. --Tanweer (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  73. --Fano (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  74. --Omnilaika02 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  75. --MRG90 (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  76. --White DemΩn (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  77. --Lucas (talk) 23:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  78. --Rodrigo Padula (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  79. --Pablo Darko (talk) 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  80. --Stepro (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  81. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  82. --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  83. --Paolotacchi (talk) 03:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  84. --Samuele2002 (talk) 07:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  85. --wL <speak·check> 05:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  86. Olsi (talk) 23:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  87. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  88. --3Jo7 (talk) 11:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  89. --Florian838 (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  90. --Uğurkent talk 22:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  91. --Galobtter (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  92. --Pakeha (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  93. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: information about cutting-edge technology

The angle of this proposal is to look back at the content of other time capsules, which yield information about technology from the respective times.

Idea general: "(This probably isn't enough to fill the entire disc, just to serve as a portion.) What we find interesting about time capsules and old documents today is information about 'cutting edge' technology and science – the gramophone, biplanes, RADAR. So surely, we should send that – pages with the most recent advances in different sciences and branches of technology, and maybe information about what the Earth is like today." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: information about cutting-edge technology

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. 21:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  3. ...Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. --Miguu (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: Decoding with DNA

This one looks beyond humans, literally. What to include on the disc that could be useful, in case by some means it would be possible (for someone?) to bring back humanity from extinction.

Idea general: "Focus on ensuring humans can be brought back from extinction and on ensuring that whoever finds it can make sense of it even if they lack familiarity with human languages or software. Both are best accomplished by including snippets of Earth’s biosphere’s native language: DNA. Include the articles "Human", "De-extinction", "Human Genome", the actual human genome, Good and Featured articles of organisms with a DNA barcode, the periodic table, Solar System bodies, spacecraft articles, and articles on all letters, numbers, and human languages. Fill the remaining space with whatever other proposal is voted second." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: Decoding with DNA

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --Aranae (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. #--Mickey83 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. --Zzyzx (talk) 17:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. --Anntinomy (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: Risk of Extinction

Has oído sobre listas de especies en peligro de extinción? Este escenario está recogiendo el contenido que considera información sobre cosas que probablemente será ido pronto.

Idea general: "Focus on preserving information on things that have a high probability of disappearing within the next decades, centuries, and millenia. Include all articles in all languages in the following categories (or equivalent - I am working off of en.wikipedia): Category:IUCN Red List extinct in the wild species, Category:IUCN Red List critically endangered species, Category:IUCN Red List endangered species, Category:IUCN Red List vulnerable species, Category:World Heritage Sites in Danger, and Category:Endangered_languages; and the articles on the following list: UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists. Include the entire wikipedia of any language that is found in Category:Endangered_languages." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: Risk of Extinction

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. --Aranae (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. ...Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. --AzorAhai (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. --Bastenbas (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. --Miguu (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. --MRG90 (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. --Chiborg (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. --PupyFaki (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Let's work on: ... wait, no, let's not

Esta opción representa las preguntas sobre la idea básica de Wikipedia a la Luna. ¿Debería el mundo comunitario comprometerse y editar contenido dentro de este proyecto? Para incluir estas voces, hemos añadido esta opción.

Idea general: "Don't make this a global thing, don't call for action." Véase la discusión completa aquí!

¡Vota aquí!

Votes: ... wait, no, let's not

  1. Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. AndyVolykhov (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. —Marco Aurelio 10:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) I'd hope that we had so much enthusiasm on rather more important things such as fixing bugs and admin tools development. Apparently not this year either...[reply ]
  4. BethNaught (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. pne (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. I don't like any of the options (including this one). Nemo 16:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Resultado

Congratulations, everybody! Thanks to everyone who cast their votes, we now have a winning scenario, and it is "All featured articles and lists on all Wikipedias". In total, 152 unique voters took part in this decision.

What happens now? This result means that Wikipedians from every language community are warmly invited in the upcoming weeks and months to work on their best articles and lists, to be included on the data disc. Details about how to actually do things will follow in the next few days.

For now, thanks to everyone who voted! We put the proposal up on Meta-Wiki on 24 April. The pages were immediately translated by volunteers into more than 60 languages. Many people engaged in the 6-week-discussion about how (and if) to work on this together. Out of 17 scenarios, 10 were available to be voted on over the past 2 weeks. Now the working phase/editing will be open until 31 October, leaving much time to select and improve content, or solve challenges along the way.

The goal is to finish our "Wikipedia time capsule" by 5 December 2016, which is International Volunteers Day.

Notas

(追記) (追記ここまで) Please note: Two of the scenarios that have been discussed expand their ideas beyond Wikipedia itself, one proposing to select content from all Wikimedia projects, the other focusing on Wikidata. Both scenarios are valid suggestions, but we have been explicitly approached for Wikipedia, not other projects for this gift. The following are all eligible proposals:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /