Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

User:COIBot/XWiki/zeta.torrent.googlepages.com

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

BOT generated XWiki report. The bot reports here when:

  • More than 66% of the cross-wiki placing and addition of this link has been performed by one editor, and the link has been added to 3 or more wikimedia sites.
  • The user is adding more than 2 domains to more than 2 wikis, but they all reside on the same server.
  • The links are exclusively added by IPs to more than 2 wikis.
  • Several IPs are adding the link to more than 2 wikis, but the IPs are in a close (/24) range.
[edit ]

    zeta.torrent.googlepages.com

    (LinkSearch: meta | en | es | de | fr | ru | zh | simple | c | d | Wikipedias: top 25 · 50 · major wikis · sc · gs)(Search: Google | en (G) | fr (G) | de (G) | meta (G) | backlinks | → links ←)zeta.torrent.googlepages.com
    (Reports: Report ← track | XWiki | Local | en | find entry)(DomainTools: whois | AboutUs | Malware?)


    74.125.47.118

    (LinkSearch: meta | en | es | de | fr | ru | zh | simple | c | d | Wikipedias: top 25 · 50 · major wikis · sc · gs)(Search: Google | en (G) | fr (G) | de (G) | meta (G) | backlinks | → links ←)74.125.47.118
    (Reports: Report ← track | XWiki | Local | en | find entry)(DomainTools: whois | AboutUs | Malware?)

    Users
    [edit ]

      User:85.18.117.194(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
      (spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)

      (commons: talk (←links) || Edits: +/- || search)
      (enwiki: talk (←links) || Edits: +/- || search)(Tools: GUC | gblock | log | → links ← User talk ) | (Reports: COIBot)


        User:84.223.99.87(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
        (spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)

        (commons: talk (←links) || Edits: +/- || search)
        (enwiki: talk (←links) || Edits: +/- || search)(Tools: GUC | gblock | log | → links ← User talk ) | (Reports: COIBot)

        Last additions by user(s):


          User:84.223.99.87(IP tools: Google | WHOIS | domaintools | RBL | tools)
          (spamhaus | projecthoneypot | malwareurl)

          (commons: talk (←links) || Edits: +/- || search)
          (enwiki: talk (←links) || Edits: +/- || search)(Tools: GUC | gblock | log | → links ← User talk ) | (Reports: COIBot)

          COIBot rules
          [edit ]
          • Link is not on the blacklist.
          • None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
          • Link is not on the whitelist.
          • Link would be caught by rule \bzeta\.torrent\.googlepages\.com\b on the monitor list (Link has been added to more than 5 wikipedia by 85.18.117.194 ).
          Additions
          [edit ]

          Additions in database of this link

          Entry
          [edit ]

          Log entry for the Spam blacklist:

          \bzeta\.torrent\.googlepages\.com\b    # ADMINNAME # {{sbl-diff|#}}; see [[User:COIBot/XWiki/zeta.torrent.googlepages.com]]
          
          Discussion
          [edit ]

          Request Status - Closed

          See COIBot report for more details. --COIBot 18:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

          The page is in all cases 'Bittorrent', parse error in a bot-version. Sorry. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 14:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
          I repaired the database for this three records manually. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 15:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

          Reverted. Torrent search engine. Blacklist if it reoccurs. --Erwin(85) 21:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


          Closed report, reopened. --COIBot 18:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

          Added  Added  — Mike.lifeguard  | talk 00:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
          Reverted remaining links.  — Mike.lifeguard  | talk 00:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

          prior discussion

          Hi Mike, i see my site zeta torrent in blacklist.. can you give me the reason?

          I put the link only in the pages that contains url similar and that i think worst searcher .. if u dislike it, you can remove it from external links section (i'm not a bot and i don't repost) but why put in black list??

          You leave other sites (without good results) i speak about bittorrent (it version but in other languages is the same):

          torrentle? some technology (googlecse) but less sites ... less usefull results.. multitorrent? multi-frame site .. youtorrent? dont search anymore in multiple sites but only in few and limitated

          Have you tried it? Have you try others sites that are linked from bittorrent in wikipedia first put in blacklist??

          I spend much time for search good torrent sites and every day i search others valuable domain / pattern, instead you leave oldest.

          How i regards you for your works and time spend on wikipedia don't offende my work. So, i ask to remove my link from blacklist.

          Best regards and sorry for my bad english, [Nickel22]

          At the end of the day it is Spam. It is unwanted and also it is Illegal to use a torrent to download anything or share files. Vandalismterminator 10:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
          The domain was blacklisted after this report, showing excessive linking across many wikis. Such linking is unneeded, unwanted, and unwelcome. You are welcome to open a request for de-listing on Talk:Spam blacklist. However, unless the domain is going to be used to benefit our projects, it will not be de-blacklisted.  — Mike.lifeguard  | @en.wb 14:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
          So, linux distro on torrent circuit is illegal... :O are you sure? i think no... technologies or alghorithms is not illegal, persons use it illegally or not, what about this? so, zeta is not in many wikies, only in 1 article (check it) ... more translations - ok - but 1 article and in this, only, in which there are others links in the same category that after comparision are result worst.
          With your idea, you can blacklist all links in 'others links' and 'external links' on wikipedia? Compliment :)
          Benefit? good word... but.. youtorrent, torrentle, multitorrent, pizzatorrent and others links on wiki-articles are benefit for wikipedia? mmm it's strange.. you talk me about "Illegal to use torrent" so wiki is illegal? Confused @_@
          I removed one dead link and correct some wrong title, it's spam? it's botting? if yes please correct this too :|
          i think that you have just remove the links, not more.. if i repost in same or others article: Yes I am a botter / spammer.. go in the hell blacklist.. one post is Spam?? Are You sure about this? exaggerated :P
          If you dislike it ok I accept it and i dont repost (dude I am not a troll or botter and dont talk about this), it's ok remvoe it! First compare and then target with "bot" or "spam" label.
          For me is all, but think about this and then write response if You want.
          Bye bye Mike, [Nickel22]
          Sorry, you seem to have confused who said what. It was Vandalismterminator who said that, and I said that. You'll note that it's not simply one addition. If you wish to appeal the blacklisting, please add a section for community input on Talk:Spam blacklist.  — Mike.lifeguard  | @en.wb 15:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
          I have moved here the posts because is more inherent and all can read all discussion. Sorry Mike I have read the two posts in one, but my response and my idea is the same, only split it :) I think that isn't correct.. torrent is not illegal, if wikipedia give me the opportunity of edit article I put my best idea and know-how on it.. if this dont like, ok the community change it.. this is the might of wiki! But.. dont target an idea/concept/wip with label Spam, Bot or Illegal without a good reason or i don't see it.
          Bye bye [Nickel22]
          Sorry, this has nothing to do with torrents being legal or not (in fact, they are legal so far as I'm aware), but rather with excessive linking across many wikis, as shown above.  — Mike.lifeguard  | @en.wb 19:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
          No, I am sorry for you.. if this is your idea of freedom-wikipedia, starting today, has less value for me. Sorry for my english and for my bad concept, next time i think that the links are piloted / sponsored not only best-based, not much more. Good work at all. [Nickel22]
          Freedom within community-defined norms. One of those norms is that excessive linking is inappropriate. As such, the domain was blacklisted. Your request is hardly convincing at this moment - Not done  — Mike.lifeguard  | @en.wb 01:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
          Dude, i wrote the same in previous post so i shared your idea but not how You apply it. At the end, I think that you are a great man but I can't understand becouse you won't see what i speak about. Thanks for candy & explanation. So, this is all for me. Good work and best regards. [Nickel22] 14:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
          Endorse blacklisting, we are writing a (free) encyclopedia here, not a linkfarm, or an internet directory, and therefore don't have to link to free torrent sites (except if they would be the subject of an article, which means they should be notable. Please review local external link policies, you will see that this way of linkplacing is outside of the scope of an encyclopedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 13:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

          AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /