Stewards/confirm/2010/Shizhao

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

• No statement does not look very convincing to me. Do you really want to help us again? I'd appreciate it. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep, user's steward status was on hiatus while serving on the ombudsman commission, so did not have access to the tools. Kylu 02:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Wasn't listed till less than 48 hours ago, I am sure he will put up a statement. Reconfirm based on 2008 contributions (why I'm going for reconfirmation now, rather than later, so people remember :) ) ++Lar: t/c 03:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Per Kylu; confirm. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Keep Keep Per above --WizardOfOz ^talk 10:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• (削除) Neutral for now. I'd like to see a statement. (削除ここまで) - Confirm. --Erwin 13:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• inactive - so adios! We have too little active Stewarts but so much users think beacuase of Stewards like you we have enough. Marcus Cyron 17:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  Marcus, he wasn't active during the last year because he was in the ombudsmen commission. Ombudsmen are not supposed to be active as steward or CU/OS during their term. --თოგო ^(D) 16:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  Then he has to give back the buttons for this time and start now a new try. Hanging on the buttons helps nobody. Marcus Cyron 12:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• wait to see statement , otherwise remove otherwise keep :) --Mardetanha ^talk 18:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep per Kylu.--Jusjih 04:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• weak keep --FiliP ██ 11:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I'd like to ask for information regarding how involved Shizhao has been in the work of the OC over the past year. I'm currently under the impression that he more-or-less disappeared from doing that work. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 14:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  As well, I want to be sure that the comments from last year are taken into consideration here. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  Well, given that my impression of not being involved hasn't been contradicted, and the concerns raised in the RFC and again at last year's half-confirmation haven't been so much as addressed (much less resolved), I'm going to say Remove Remove. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 00:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Confirmed - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Razor flame 07:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Since you have been on the ombudsmen committee, it makes sense you have little/no activity. Assuming you will read up on the changes etc in the manual, I think it makes sense to let you be confirmed. Effeietsanders 11:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --Jyothis 17:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• keep without a shadow of a doubt. oscar 00:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Welcome back -- ※(注記) JéRRy ┼ 雨雨 ※(注記) 16:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep 让他留下 — bastique ^demandez! 16:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• has to be keep after the punishment of Ombudspeopleseses. ;-) WB. billinghurst sDrewth 14:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Confirm, though I'm in agreement with Mike-lifeguard. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support, experienced steward. —Innv {ru-ws} 00:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Keep Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Remove Remove. OTRS Chinese queue received a ticket concerning improper removal of certain political views that is against Shizhao's believes (aka POV-pushing). In addition, Shizhao ran a CU request at home wiki (which should be avoided) AND Spacebirdy deemed it as no reasons given for running this check. OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 04:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. I am, actually, puzzled by the fact that Shizhao didn't get back his steward permissions after his mandate as Ombudsman. --Millosh 13:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

  He was given a pass on last year's confirmation, despite serious concerns being raised, including concerns about his use of steward/checkuser tools. He can't have another pass this year. So here we are. Sadly, none of the information I've requested has materialized. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 00:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Keep Keep --junafani 23:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep An experienced and active steward is an asset.--Aphaia 09:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --Geitost ^diskusjon 02:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Remove Remove. SergeyJ 22:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Remove Remove DerHexer and Lifeguard have my pulse. Thank you for your service. NonvocalScream 00:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• As FiliP, this year you show that you deserve to be a steward. LeinaD (t) 17:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Remove Remove per NonvocalScream. Bolo1910 06:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep per Effeietsanders. Shizhao been a valuable steward before becoming a member of the Commission, and he'll surely be one again. --MF-W 18:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Remove Remove per NonvocalScream. Jayjg 19:48, 28 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep --Djordjes (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

• Steward confirmations 2010