Stewards/confirm/2009/Pathoschild

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

• Support Support Yes, excellent steward! Majorly ^talk 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Yep. --Kanonkas 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Pathoschild is an excellent steward. — Aitias // discussion 00:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Doing a great job as a steward, always ready to help! thanks! --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 00:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support As a small wiki user, I watch the steward's activity on a regular basis. Definite support.--Yaroslav Blanter 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Thank you for all your help at any time! --Thogo (talk) 01:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Support - extremely lazy but useful when he isn't dozing off :) ..--Comet styles 03:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Pathoschild is helpful and has been around forever; at least forever from my point of view. :) Great steward. Prodego ^talk 03:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• His lazy is some other peoples whirling dervish of hyperproductivity. Where would we BE without all his toolsmithing? Makes the work of every steward easier, he does. Needs to dump that loser girlfriend of his though, she is too bossy. And wear some bright colors once in a while. ++Lar: t/c 04:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz ^talk 06:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support When I have any kind of tech trouble, I'm used to ping Pathos, and he's always available to help me. Thanks!--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 13:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Yes, although sometimes he lazes :P The Helpful One 15:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support -- Mercy (☎|✍ ) 16:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support SupportActive, highly capable... keeping him around will be good for the projects. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support A natural. Keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Per everyone else. Keep! Razorflame 21:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support SupportVery helpful. miranda 21:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support SupportStellar steward, very lazy. Definite support. --Charitwo 23:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Keep Pathos --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Our beloved script kiddie. ;) Could somebody imagine a wiki-world without Pathos? /me not. Confirm, of course! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support SupportOne of the best around. Glass Cobra 15:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Ayuh. -- Avi 16:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Yes. JoshuaZ 16:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep for sure. →Na · gy 19:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support No doubt about Pathoschild's value as a steward. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Don't go anywhere. —Sean Whitton / 18:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support his steward work is visible and it is very good.Juan de Vojníkov 20:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --oscar 22:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Not met much, but please continue the good work!! :-) Romaine 23:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --Meno25 00:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Very useful Slavie. Coded much needed scripts to improve various flags use, and I hope he'll continue. DarkoNeko 00:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support.--Jusjih 03:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --Taichi - (あ!) 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support ---Zyephyrus 22:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Woudloper 11:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 12:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Part of the basic infrastructure. –Ejs-80 22:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira ^falaê 16:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support. Trustworthy and active (without having any major mistake). Alefbe 20:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support (insert witty in-joke here) Kylu 20:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support ...Aurora... 13:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Oppose Oppose. J'aimerais savoir à quoi rime le petit jeu suivant autour de la confirmation de Shanel, amie de Pathoschild :
  1. 2 février à 06:00 (UTC), Pathoschild crée le modèle OPPOSE : http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:OPPOSE&oldid=1369674 ;
  2. 2 février à 06:04 (UTC), Schiste place un vote OPPOSE pour Shanel : http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm/2009/Shanel&diff=1369680&oldid=1369128 ;
  3. 2 février à 06:08 (UTC), Shanel répond à Schiste : http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm/2009/Shanel&diff=next&oldid=1369680 ;
  4. 2 février à 08:12 (UTC), un autre contributeur change de modèle (OPPOSE --> Oppose) : http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm/2009/Shanel&diff=next&oldid=1369683 ;
  5. 2 février à 10:35 (CET), Pathoschild éprouve le besoin de placer un lien permanent vers la version initiale du vote de Schiste, qui recourait au modèle créé quatre minutes plus tôt par Pathoschild : http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm/2009/Shanel&diff=next&oldid=1369925.
  Question : sommes-nous, avec les votes de confirmations des stewards, dans une cour de récréation ? J'en ai bien l'impression. Désolé, mais je n'ai aucune confiance dans les gens qui s'amusent à ce type de petits jeux puérils. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
  Translation: "Oppose. I would like to know the meaning of this little game around the confirmation of Shanel, Pathoschild's friend:

  • 2 February at 6:00 (UTC), Pathoschild creates the OPPOSE template: diff;
  • 2 February at 6:04 (UTC), Schiste places an OPPOSE vote for Shanel: diff;
  • 2 February at 6:08 (UTC), Shanel responds to Schiste: diff;
  • 2 February at 6:12 (UTC), another contributor changes the template (OPPOSE --> Oppose): diff;
  • 2 February at 10:35 (UTC), Pathoschild feels the need to place a permalink towards Schiste's initial vote, which uses the template created four minutes before by Pathoschild: diff;

  Question: are we, with the steward confirmation votes, in a playground? I certainly have that impression. Sorry, but I have no confidence in those people who amuse themselves with these silly childish games." —translated by Pathoschild.

  Bonjour Hégésippe. J'ai créé le modèle avec une intention humoristique au cours d'une discussion dans #wikimedia-stewards ^connect , pensant le supprimer bientôt sans utilisation. Schiste l'a en fait utilisé, mais son commentaire a plus tard été remaniée. Puisque cette refactorisation a changé tout le sens de son commentaire (à partir de non-opposition humoristique à une réelle opposition), j'ai noté le changement.

  Je crois qu'un humour retenue est nécessaire dans tous les stewards, sinon on très vite succombe au stress qui affecte de nombreux autres contributeurs. Cependant je n'avais pas prévu que le modèle serai utilisé, ni qu'il resterai une fois qu'elle a été.

  —Pathoschild 20:30:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

  Translation: "Hello Hégésippe. I created the template humourously during a discussion in #wikimedia-stewards ^connect , expecting to delete it shortly without use. Schiste did use it, but his comment was later refactored. Since this refactoring changed the entire meaning of his comment (from humourous non-oppose to real oppose), I noted the refactoring.
  I think some restrained playfulness is necessary in all stewards; otherwise one quickly succumbs to the stress that affects many other contributors. However, I had no expectation that the template would be used at all, nor that it would remain once it was." —translated by Pathoschild.

• Support Support EdBever 19:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support - Kaare 19:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support -- billinghurst 07:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Without any doubt, a very important steward and Wikimedian. --Millosh 13:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep--Shizhao 14:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Sebleouf 22:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep-Advisory 07:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• keep the slave --FiliP ×ばつ 17:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

• Steward confirmations 2009