Meta:Requests for oversight/Pathoschild

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

• Pathoschild (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

I routinely hide attack names (and revisions) crosswiki as a steward; local oversight access would be useful for oversighting these names in Special:Log/globalauth. —Pathoschild 00:58:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

1. ok for me. --.snoopy. ✉ 07:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

   I fix for you the request :) --.snoopy. ✉ 08:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

2. support, of course. Assistance is esp. needed there. Since I became an oversight here, I cleaned more than 3'000 of such log entries. With new CentralAuth interface those actions will be reduced, so that I can finally resign from oversightship. If Pathoschild wants to overtake that position, I'm really fine. In these days I wanted to let my fellows know that I'll resign from oversightship soon because I just requested that access to clean those log entries. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Support Per myself. Seriously, excellent steward who would be a great help as an oversighter. Pmlineditor ∞ 08:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
4. Support. No-brainer. Jafeluv 09:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Support --Dferg 10:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Support--Mardetanha ^talk 11:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Sure --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Support --WizardOfOz ^talk 17:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
9. Support. vvv ^t 21:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
10. (削除) Oppose Suspicious user who I believe to be a spy (削除ここまで)Support --Charitwo 21:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
11. support using an evidence-based assessment, he passes. billinghurst sDrewth 05:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
12. Fine by me. --Erwin 15:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
13. We could use more eyes & hands on the job; no reason lazychild can't do it. — mikelifeguard@meta:~$ 19:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
14. support -- If he has nothing else to do :D Avi 21:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
15. support; –BruTe ^talk 17:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
16. Support Support --თოგო ^(D) 09:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
17. ok--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 09:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
18. Yes. --Mercy 09:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
19. Sure.--George M. 19:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
20. Sure, people with os access are needed on meta. Barras ^talk 19:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
21. Fine by me as well. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
22. Support - Nifky? 08:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
23. Support Grunny (talk) 08:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
24. Support Support, np. —Innv {ru-ws} 03:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
25. Support --- @lestaty ^discuţie 01:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Closed as successful. This has the 25 votes in support as required by the oversight policy, has been open for 10 days, and no dissenting opinions have been given. I will file a request at SRP and await the appropriate steward action. Daniel (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]