Meta:Requests for adminship/Cometstyles
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
This RFA is waay overdue. Cometstyles has been an active Metapedian since June, and is very active here, having made 693 edits, and 94 deleted ones. He's actively watching recent changes, and tags bad pages/reverts vandalism. Unlike a lot of admins here, he takes part in a lot of Meta affairs such as Proposals for closing projects, Requests for deletion, and general cleanup and copyediting to keep Meta pages at their best. He's an elected simple English Wikipedia admin, and regularly helps out on smaller projects, so he's very familiar with admin tools. He won't abuse them, he's an excellent guy, so I think you should support him. Thanks. Majorly (talk ) 14:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Gee..Thanks..I accept ^_^...--Comet styles 14:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Majorly (talk ) 14:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support :) --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 14:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support con piacere --M/ 14:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Meno25 14:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support I thought you were an admin already... Could somebody make me a list with all not-admin people who I think are admin? --OosWesThoesBes 14:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support sure!--Nick1915 - all you want 14:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support - and strongly. Will be an active asset. --Anonymous Dissident Talk 14:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Good addition to the team. --Aphaia 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support of course! --filip ⁂ 15:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support fine with me --Herby talk thyme 15:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support --.anaconda 15:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --A. B. (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support of course; very helpful and a good vandal fighter/RC patroller. Cbrown1023 talk 21:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- +∝ --.snoopy. 21:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support He is a very helpful and friendly member of the meta community, and one I would definitely support becoming an administrator on. Razorflame 21:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Definitely a good admin candidate. Captain panda 23:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support - sure. WjBscribe 04:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support - FrancoGG ( talk ) 04:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Always nice and helpful. :) --Az1568 04:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support - super guy. Totally helpful and kind. I trust him absolutely - Alison ❤ 06:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support of course :) --Millosh 10:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support -- Adambro 11:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- support. per Majorly. --Thogo (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support obviously. jj137 ♠ 22:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support — excellent user ;-) --Agüeybaná (hábleme) 23:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Don't even need to think about this one. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Greeves (talk • contribs) 19:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Good candidate. John Reaves (talk) 00:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support--Jusjih 04:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support good fellow Gaillimh 13:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support GO! Cometyy --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Marbot 18:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Closed with rights granted. Lots of folk in favour & none against! --Herby talk thyme 10:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Sorry, I've heard it too late. I'd have supported, too, of course. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Not enough canvassing.--Werdan7 (t) 00:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]