To request checkuser access, see Requests for permissions.

Recently started fiwikinews http://fi.wikinews.org have problem that someone is registering known nicks from fiwiki claiming to be same user as in fiwiki (for example: n:fi:Käyttäjä:Ilaiho, n:fi:Käyttäjä:Iirolaiho and n:fi:Käyttäjä:QWerk). Because of this I'm requesting Checkuser to check is n:fi:Käyttäjä:Kouluhai same person as Ilaiho, Iirolaiho and QWerk (and possible some others also). Kouluhai was active user in fiwiki last year, but recently no one have heard nothing about this user, so it is very suspicious that this user would activate just for fiwikinews. Thank you in advance, br --Agony 11:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, I need a checkuser to be done on ml:User:Aparamoorthi and see whose sock is this. Please help. Thanks, --Jyothis 17:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Please include a reason as why you suspect Aparamoorthi to be a sock. --Cspurrier 21:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

The User was created while a couple of heated discussions were on. the user contributions are only in those discussions and the account was used only to abuse the fellow wikipedians. We suspect that this is a sock of the users I requested for checkuser information earlier. Thanks.--Jyothis 23:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Although there are not "identical" IPs, the class is the same from Drini results. --M/ 16:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks, M7, We appreciate it. --24.126.65.193 16:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Sorry, its me. --Jyothis 16:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

I request a checkuser on some, or all, of these users nn:Blood & Honour Scandinavia, nn:Killing Joke, nn:Petterhenriksen, nn:Ordo Ad Chao, nn:Coil, nn:Borer'n, nn:Necrofog, nn:NatRew, nn:Padima, nn:The Great Kat. (These are accounts that have been blocked the last 45 days.) These are obvious sockpuppet accounts of a longtime vandal/troll persona: Nazi/punk theme account names and articles. Creates a new user account, goes directly to the user talk page of some sysop and leaves an uncivil remark about this sysop, and/or puts Sieg Heil or links to Norwegian nazi group Vigrid in articles, etc. I'd like to know if there is an IP in common for some of these accounts, to be able to block it.

Thanks. --Jorunn 00:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Done. They appear to be using proxies on multiple free web hosts. You can range-block the following IP addresses to cover those they have used so far. No legitimate users have edited from these ranges in the last month.

—{admin} Pathoschild 00:20:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I request a checkuser on users pt:Usuário:JM-JM, pt:Usuário:Marronez and pt:Usuário:Marronez Jr.. The suspect accounts have been created in near dates and usually votes in the same matter with a difference of a few minutes, as you see below:

• PE Rádio Itapuã
• PE Rádio PampaWEB FM
• PE Rádio Zero
• PE Rede PampaWEB
• PE Temporada de ciclones...

others...

• Lista de escândalos de corrupção...
• Álibi?

Thanks in advance. - Al Lemos 13:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Done. These accounts are almost certainly run by the same person. —{admin} Pathoschild 23:50:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Request written in French: guillom or Darkoneko should understand what I am requesting smiley

• w:cv:Special:Contributions/Электронной : 2 octobre 2007 (1 edit)
• w:ia:Special:Contributions/Les amants criminels : 29 septembre (1 edit)
• w:ilo:Special:Contributions/Dédicace : 2 octobre (1 edit)
• w:io:Special:Contributions/RAison de commodité... : 2 octobre (1 edit)

Dans les quatre cas, le fâcheux utilise le style et la manière du vandale Club-Internet (« gros naze »), mais il paraît plus probable qu'il soit un pénible belge hélas bien connu. Quoi qu'il en soit, je demande :

• que les quatres comptes soient bloqués indéfiniment ;
• que leurs adresses IP soient relevées par le steward agissant temporairement comme CU ;
• qu'il soit vérifié, sur chacun de ces comptes, que l'adresse IP correspondante n'a pas servi à créer un autre sockpuppet ;
• que les quatre adresses IP (ou moins s'il y en a moins en réalité) soient communiquées aux titulaires du CU sur wp-FR, pour parfaire (si nécessaire), la lutte contre le pénible belge soupçonné : en recourant à cette méthode voici quelques mois sur wp-KAB, guillom avait ainsi permis de neutraliser, sur wp-FR une douzaine de faux-nez d'un autre pénible de longue durée.

Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

J'oubliais la même chose avec ces trois comptes (déjà bloqués) sur des projets francophones (hors Wikipédia) :

• n:fr:Special:Contributions/Nicoles brandache
• s:fr:Special:Contributions/Ederic le Sage
• wikt:fr:Special:Contributions/Le jeu du dictionnaire

Cette fois, ça doit être bon smiley (en attendant, hélas, les suivants...) Hégésippe | ±Θ± 17:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Je m'en occupe / Doing it now. guillom 17:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

J'ai bloqué les comptes non encore bloqués. Toutes les IP appartiennent au bloc 87.65.128.0 - 87.65.255.255 attribué à Skynet / Belgacom. C'est Scolas, que j'ai retrouvé sur fr.wp sous l'identité d'Insiraf, maintenant bloqué indéfiniment. guillom 18:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Nouvelle fournée (7 octobre) :

• mi:Special:Contributions/Benvenutto : 4 edits, les 2 et 7 octobre (bloqué un mois)
• mi:Special:Contributions/85.27.7.9 : 2 edits, le 7 octobre (bloqué un mois)
• ve:Special:Contributions/خنزير – Edits : 5, le 7 octobre (non bloqué)
• ve:Special:Contributions/خنزير – Edits : 2, le 7 octobre (non bloqué)

si les résultats ne donnent que 85.27.7.9, l'IP a déjà été transmise aux CU de wp-FR.

Hégésippe | ±Θ± 13:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC) + 19:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply ]

Benvenutto@miwiki et ‏خنزير@vewiki‎ semble être les mêmes, mais 85.27.7.9@vewiki opère à partir d'un autre fournisseur et un système différent. Je peut transférer les résultats au vérificateurs du frwiki en privée sur demande.

Translation: "Benvenutto@miwiki and ‏خنزير@vewiki‎ seem to be the same person, but 85.27.7.9@vewiki operates from a different Internet service provider and with a different software profile. I can transfer my checkuser results to the frwiki checkusers privately on request."

—{admin} Pathoschild 02:04:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

It differs from the user I am falsely accused in the multi-korean uncyclopedia flocked account has been blocked. As a school administrator I probably heard, but based on my ip that includes non-english wikipedia editing ip. Ip was also trying to look up to me and are extremely different. Checkusing please.Kverti 01:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

If I understand correctly, you want us to check if qwerty@kowiki and betalph@kowiktionary are used by different people, or the same person. Is this correct? —{admin} Pathoschild 00:13:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

yes.Kverti 04:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Inconclusive. Betalph@kowiktionary operates from a different IP address range owned by the same Internet service provider as Hanguler@kowiki, who also edited from a different IP address that is shared by qwerty@kowiki. Hanguler@kowiki and qwerty@kowiki are both blocked and have identical software profiles, although the profiles are too generic to be indicative. So, checkuser data shows that the accounts may be used by the same person, but there's no conclusive evidence either way. —{admin} Pathoschild 05:32:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

There are not many Internet companies in Korea.(i am betalph)Multicode 12:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

• CheckUser Policy

• Meta-Wiki requests