Wiktionary/logo/refresh/voting/tally1: Difference between revisions

Username MUST be specified! Yair rand 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Skyler13 00:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Leftmostcat 00:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Prince Kassad 00:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Ruakh _TALK 00:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Nadando 01:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Mateus RM ^talk 01:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Tiles suck deeply. Vahagn Petrosyan 02:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Similar to the favicon I made a few months ago; Hippietrail 02:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Like this one much better than the alternative, and it's definitely a HUGE improvement over the current logo. Jonhall 03:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Much more elegant than the other option. Sephia karta 05:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! So much better and more professional. Chuffable 06:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Acee8 07:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! 334a 07:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! IRTC1015 07:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Beautiful!! rursus 08:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I like this one. Barras ^talk 09:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Good Badbread 09:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I agree this could use simplifying, but it embodies a dictionary perfectly. Icqgirl 09:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Needs to be simplified, otherwise it won't look like a Wikimedia logo. –blurpeace ^(talk) 09:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! We're not playing Mahjongg. Tiles with color are too busy. IShadowed 10:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Tiptoety ^talk 10:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pretty nice.Gaeser 10:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pharamp 11:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Beautiful. Tosca 12:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! But if it is supposed to be like the wp logo, some pieces should be missing. Soeb ^{talk|contribs} 12:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Littha.PL 12:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pullus In Fabula 12:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 12:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Sam Hocevar 13:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Aktron 13:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! DarkSTALKER 13:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Cdhaptomos 13:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Elleff Groom 14:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC).[reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Thrissel 15:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I've never really liked the tile logo. Kennercat 15:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Scrabble tiles are trademarked and this logo looks nicer. Dragon695 15:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Dodde 16:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I love this logo. It captures Wiktionary perfectly, and fits in with the other projects' logos far better than the Scrabble tiles (which I have always disliked). Dendodge 16:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Broc 16:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Small Bug 16:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Antal 17:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)C)[reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Style and colour scheme are more like Wikipedia, making it recognisable as a Wikimedia project. IByte 17:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! SUPPORT The tiles may be in the other languages, but with the "W" in the center, it dosen't work with all languages. The spesh man 17:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Shiny! :D SpunkyLepton 18:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pill (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I've voted for this in Round One. I keep supporting. AreaOfEffect 19:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I prefer this. Luckyz 19:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Needs to be vastly simplified. Cool pic, though. Bsimmons666 20:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Tinodela 20:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Sniff 20:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Username MUST be specified! Needs to be simplified. Zoom in on the right side? Stephane8888 20:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Jacob Myers 21:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Rodasmith 21:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! This logo is the best! I don't see the appeal of the tiles (i.e. the logo to the right). Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The other one is definitely not it. Alvestrand 21:18, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The tiles are ugly as sin. MZMcBride 21:18, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Марио Николов 21:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Moez ^talk 21:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! gray is more neutral. Pixeltoo 22:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! //Shell 22:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
~~(削除) Username MUST be specified! Better if the book is less reclined. The other picture could be used as favicon Airon90 22:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC) (削除ここまで)~~ Change of vote --Airon90 08:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The New Mikemoral 22:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Smiddle 22:18, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! T.M.M. Dowd 23:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! a tastefully coloured version would also be good, but Wiktionary is not Scrabble(r) so I have never supported the tile logo. Thryduulf (en.wikt,en.wp,commons) 00:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The other logo looks barbarically horrible! It looks like a childish toy; this one looks serious - An elegant and professional looking book as a logo, rather than som' coffee coloured Scrabble pieces. MrGulli
Username MUST be specified! i agree that the other one is definitely not it. Wikit2009 01:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Support - The other logo looks unprofessional. This one, while generic, is marginally better than the other one. Shushruth 01:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Di ego UFCG 01:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Svenji 01:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! better than the other, but worst as the same in all Wiktionaries languages. JackPotte 02:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I would have preferred "Stylised Book with Stylised Entry", but this isn't bad. However, it is crucial that we lose the text underneath. Urhixidur 03:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 03:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Much better than scrabble pieces. Anunnakki 03:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Lemonsquash 04:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I don't understand what tiles have to do with a dictionary specifically -- the other logo could be for any Wiki project. BirdValiant 05:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Devin Murphy 90 05:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC) I would rather the new logo not feature a book of any kind because Wiktionary is not a book but a web site. But if it's going to be the "book" or the "tiles" I prefer the book because its more professional looking then the tiles. Also it gives a nice wink to the Wikipedia logo and besides the tiles look cheep to me, even a little like their made out of plastic. As well this is an improvement over the cornet logo. Though if we do use this one we'll have to make some variations with the writing and puzzle pieces being on the opposite pages of the book for the languages that write from right to left.[reply ]
Comment: Could some pro-book users please respond to how anglocentric this option and the process is on the talk page? Warmest Regards, :) _thecurran Speak your mind ^{my past} 06:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Keith111 07:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Adikhebat 07:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I vote no Scrabble or mah jongg. Plus this one looks more professional and more Wikimedia. Garrettw87 07:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pmlineditor ∞ 08:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pierro009 08:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! NoX 08:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Dato deutschland 09:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Pamputt 09:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Albamhandae 09:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Mirgolth 10:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Murator 10:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Nouill 10:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! putnik 11:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Quentinv57 11:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! But we'll REALLY have to do something with its lowscale version and favicon. I think something taken from IPA could do the job. Peleg 11:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Fmaunier 13:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Nefronus 13:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Apalis 13:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! 宇宙之皇 14:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! 灰色系的,不錯!建議左邊不要都是英文,建議右邊的「拼圖效果」做大一點。 Simon951434 14:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Limonadis 14:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Gdgourou 14:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Andreas Rejbrand 14:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Much more detailed and language-ambiguous than the other candidate Cyndaquazy 16:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Saxum 16:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! L'horrifiant engoulevent casse-moloch écraseroc 17:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Béria Lima ^Msg 17:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Trebawa 17:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! JoolzWiki 17:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! One half 3544 18:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Alexdubr 18:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Nlvwarren 19:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! \ Mike 19:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Balthazar ^(T|C) 19:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The concerns about anglocentrism should be addressed, though - perhaps use discernibly different languages on left side?Anypodetos 19:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! ... auf Deutsch - in German C: Jens Liebenau 19:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Conrad.Irwin 20:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! თოგო ^(D) 20:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Temuri 21:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! It'll require some touch-ups, I'm sure, but this is the best of the proposed logos. CF84 21:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Eusbarbosa 22:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Sinse59 23:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Arny 01:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! It certainly has to be revised and simplified, but it's surely a better option compared to the tiles, since the latter does not quite resemble Wikipedia's or the other Wikimedia projects' logos at all. I was favorable of something more colorful and closer to the MetaWiki logo, as was my vote on the first round, but out of these two options, the most professional one is clearly the book logo. Krystoffer 01:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --Taichi - (あ!) 02:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I would rather have something that looks like a dictionary than the more abstract collection of tiles. Rchandra 02:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! -- "Tiles" isn't a bad logo, Tiles is just a bad logo for a dictionary. OTOH, with this logo, concerns about contrast, exact language visible on the page upon extreme magnification, etc. can all be fixed by minor tweaks. It looks classy, and the fundamental concept behind it -- a serious dictionary -- is correct. - RedWordSmith 03:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! beautiful logo :) --Mintz0223 03:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --Cvmontuy 03:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! —Voidxor 04:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Beautiful design. It looks great from up close or far away, on both small and large screens. --Nintend06 04:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The other option doesn't send the message of "dictionary" very well, in fact it's quite vague. This one looks more professional and gets the message across. It is also more recognisable in a monochrome format. Nevertheless, there are still a few improvements that I could suggest, for example (slight) simplification (especially of the left hand side), vectorisation and a more pronounced puzzle piece effect (larger individual pieces). Transparent 6lue 05:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --Captain Bradley 05:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Sergay 06:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! More professional looking, but it does need work. For example the top is too bright and hard on the eyes. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 06:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! This is clearly more visually pleasing. I would support making allowance for the text (the text within the book) to be rewritten on Wiktionaries whose primary languages don't use the Latin script, as long as it was tastefully done. However, the text is fairly small, so it's quite possible no one would feel like doing it. Atelaes 06:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --Altales Teriadem 07:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! , but I hope that the remaining blank puzzle pieces can be filled with alphabets and characters too. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia/Logo#SVG Version of revisions (Wikipedia logo 2.0). -- Kevinhksouth 07:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --Lépton ^✉ 07:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! -- Much better than the alternativeCrazyInSane 08:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Looks like a dictionary with a wikipedia connection, perfect. Ralmin 09:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Kwj2772 (msg) 09:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --GnuDoyng 11:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Mewasul 12:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Calavera 13:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Poxnar 15:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Tohru 16:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Epiq 16:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Wadzar 18:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! But with bigger puzzle pieces. Isofox 17:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Because the tile logo is entirely, entirely unsuitable. --Neskaya kanetsv? 19:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Authentic, representative. Trap The Drum Wonder 19:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Acuinas 21:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The "jigsaw" needs to have fewer pieces and bolder lines so as to be clearly visible at the size it's going to be used on every page. But this is definitely a solid design.--Father Goose 20:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! It is better than the other candidate. December21st2012Freak 20:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! For most people (those who write from left to right), the left side represent the past and the right is the future. My advice is thus to flip the icon to show a constructing book rather than a book blowing away (but that's ok too). Jona 20:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Thirafydion 21:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Cheat2win 21:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! I voted for this one initially! The book design really looks cool. dragoneye776
Username MUST be specified! Chhe 21:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Bille.Alan 21:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Kleinepanzer 03:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! KAtremer 00:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Alagos 02:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Jfc12 02:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Ienpw III 04:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The tiles one...I get the feeling that Wiktionary is incomplete and cannot be relied on. NagamasaAzai 05:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! UpstateNYer 05:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! S4ndm4n 09:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Karelklic 09:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Managerarc 09:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Bouznak 12:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Caligari 11:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! wykymania 11:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Garnesson 12:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Tommyv580 12:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Il fait plus sérieux que celui avec les tuiles Jul13520 14:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Vesailok 15:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Chrono1084 15:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Dodoïste 16:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Ar mythra 16:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>[reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Xzapro4 16:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Gigs 21:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Ldfifty 21:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! For this one (professional looking, dictionary-like, elegant, remind Wikipedia), although there is still room for improvement (scale...) ; and against the tiles for several reasons (variability when one unique, common logo is needed, W centered, looks too much like toys, too fragmented, messy). Darkdadaah 22:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Wonderful. A nice, serious, true dictionary.TrainmasterCRC 22:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Jklamo 22:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Orchew 23:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Like others I think this could benefit from simplifying (bigger puzzle pieces) and such, but overall it's a much more solid candidate than the tiles. --Aselfcallednowhere 02:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! julroy67 02:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Alex6122 03:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! The Jade Knight 03:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! This one looks cleaner, more professional, and I just like it more. Bobamnertiopsis 04:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! RekonDog 04:28, 05 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! and bigger puzzle pieces please. --Yueman 10:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Definitely this one, looks clean and professional and it has same kind of feeling as the wikipedia logo --Ionwind 11:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Leolaursen 11:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! --Goktr001 11:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! PAC2 12:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! NeoCreator 16:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! hope votes from non contributors are appreciated too. Quatar 13:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! This one is more pretty. Luizdl 15:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Phantomsteve 15:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
Username MUST be specified! Wild mine 16:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary/logo/refresh/voting/tally1&oldid=1791677"