RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 - Suggested New 4.1.1-ish SC Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 30 September)
Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Sailesh Panchang (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Steve Faulkner (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Sailesh Panchang (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 White, Jason J (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Charu D Pandhi (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Friday, 30 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Friday, 30 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 30 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Friday, 30 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 30 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 30 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Sailesh Panchang (Thursday, 29 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 30 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 White, Jason J (Friday, 30 September)
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Thursday, 29 September)
**correction** [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 28 September 2016 Shadi Abou-Zahra (Thursday, 29 September)
[Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 28 September 2016 Shadi Abou-Zahra (Wednesday, 28 September)
- RE: [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 28 September 2016 Vivienne Conway (Thursday, 29 September)
- RE: [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force- Meeting on 28 September 2016 alands289@gmail.com (Thursday, 29 September)
Second screen API and working group Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 27 September)
- Re: Second screen API and working group James Nurthen (Wednesday, 28 September)
- RE: Second screen API and working group Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 28 September)
- RE: Second screen API and working group john.foliot (Wednesday, 28 September)
Adding a resource to Understanding 2.4.2 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 27 September)
- Re: Adding a resource to Understanding 2.4.2 James Nurthen (Tuesday, 27 September)
- RE: Adding a resource to Understanding 2.4.2 alands289@gmail.com (Tuesday, 27 September)
WCAG WG Meeting September 27, 2017 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 27 September)
WCAG Agenda Sept 27th, 2016 josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 23 September)
- FW: WCAG Agenda Sept 27th, 2016 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 26 September)
- Re: WCAG Agenda Sept 27th, 2016 Mike Elledge (Monday, 26 September)
Failures Definition (Problem?) John Foliot (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) Léonie Watson (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) John Foliot (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 22 September)
- RE: Failures Definition (Problem?) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) John Foliot (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) Christophe Strobbe (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) John Foliot (Thursday, 22 September)
- RE: Failures Definition (Problem?) Jonathan Avila (Thursday, 22 September)
- Re: Failures Definition (Problem?) Kurt Mattes (Thursday, 22 September)
Minutes of WCAG F2F of 20 September 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 20 September)
Missing scribing notes Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 20 September)
- Re: Missing scribing notes josh@interaccess.ie (Tuesday, 20 September)
WCAG meeting with DPUB in DPUB room Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 19 September)
Discussion materials for TPAC Kepeng Li (Sunday, 18 September)
- Re: Discussion materials for TPAC josh@interaccess.ie (Sunday, 18 September)
Fwd: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 Michael Cooper (Friday, 16 September)
- RE: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 Jonathan Avila (Friday, 16 September)
- Re: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 Joshue O Connor (Saturday, 17 September)
- Re: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 john.foliot (Saturday, 17 September)
- RE: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 27 September)
- Re: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 john.foliot (Saturday, 17 September)
- Re: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 Joshue O Connor (Saturday, 17 September)
- Re: Fwd: DRM protest timed with TPAC 2016 Joshue O Connor (Saturday, 17 September)
Fwd: [TPAC 2016] reminder about airport transfers Michael Cooper (Friday, 16 September)
Minutes of Silver sub-group teleconference of 16 September Jeanne Spellman (Friday, 16 September)
Remote participation for TPAC Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 15 September)
Minutes of the Silver sub-group teleconference of 13 September 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 13 September)
Report from Silver sub-group on the Options for Designing Silver Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 13 September)
- Re: Report from Silver sub-group on the Options for Designing Silver Sarah Horton (Monday, 19 September)
- RE: Report from Silver sub-group on the Options for Designing Silver Jonathan Avila (Monday, 19 September)
- Re: Report from Silver sub-group on the Options for Designing Silver Sarah Horton (Monday, 19 September)
- RE: Report from Silver sub-group on the Options for Designing Silver Jonathan Avila (Monday, 19 September)
deleted message
- Re: Fw: means a lot to me r12a (Tuesday, 13 September)
Minutes of the SIlver Sub-group meeting of 9 September Jeanne Spellman (Friday, 9 September)
[Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 8 September 2016 Shadi Abou-Zahra (Friday, 9 September)
WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 9 September)
- Re: WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 David MacDonald (Friday, 9 September)
- RE: WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 Jonathan Avila (Friday, 9 September)
- Re: WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 John Foliot (Friday, 9 September)
- Re: WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 9 September)
- Re: WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 Sarah Horton (Monday, 12 September)
- Re: WCAG Agenda September 13th, 2016 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 13 September)
Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 7 September)
- RE: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 7 September)
- Re: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? John Foliot (Wednesday, 7 September)
- Re: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 7 September)
- Re: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 7 September)
- RE: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 7 September)
- Re: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 7 September)
- RE: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 7 September)
- RE: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 7 September)
- Re: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 7 September)
- Re: Should we talk about an icon for transcripts in WCAG 2.1? Wayne Dick (Wednesday, 7 September)
Minutes of the Silver Sub-Group teleconference of 6 September Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 6 September)
COGA Feedback page josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 5 September)
No WCAG meeting Tues 6th Sept 2016 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 5 September)
Minutes of the Silver sub-group of 2 September 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Friday, 2 September)
Re: feedback loops Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 31 August)
- Re: feedback loops lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 31 August)
- Re: feedback loops Greg Lowney (Wednesday, 31 August)
- Re: feedback loops John Foliot (Wednesday, 31 August)
- Re: feedback loops Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 1 September)
- Re: feedback loops John Foliot (Wednesday, 31 August)
- Re: feedback loops Greg Lowney (Wednesday, 31 August)
CfC: To publish updated WCAG 2.0 Understanding and Techniques docs Joshue O Connor (Tuesday, 30 August)
- RE: To publish updated WCAG 2.0 Understanding and Techniques docs Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 30 August)
- Re: CfC: To publish updated WCAG 2.0 Understanding and Techniques docs Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 30 August)
- RE: CfC: To publish updated WCAG 2.0 Understanding and Techniques docs White, Jason J (Tuesday, 30 August)
- RE: To publish updated WCAG 2.0 Understanding and Techniques docs Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L. (Thursday, 1 September)
Re: WCAG MINUTES August 30, 2016 Marc Johlic (Tuesday, 30 August)
- Re: WCAG MINUTES August 30, 2016 Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 31 August)
Minutes of Silver Sub-group teleconference of 30 August 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 30 August)
WCAG Agenda August 30, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 30, 2016 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 30 August)
Minutes of the Silver Subgroup Teleconference of 26 August 2016 Sarah Horton (Friday, 26 August)
WCAG-ACTION-330: Move 2.1 requirements from w3c/wcag/ (wcag21 branch) to w3c/wcag21/ Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 25 August)
Techniques CFCs White, Jason J (Wednesday, 24 August)
CfC: Updates to H28 resources Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 August)
- RE: Updates to H28 resources Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Updates to H28 resources John Foliot (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Updates to H28 resources Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
CfC: H64 & H70 `frame` is obsoleted by HTML5 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 August)
- RE: H64 & H70 `frame` is obsoleted by HTML5 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: H64 & H70 `frame` is obsoleted by HTML5 John Foliot (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: H64 & H70 `frame` is obsoleted by HTML5 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
CfC: H73 `summary` is obsoleted by HTML5 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 August)
- RE: H73 `summary` is obsoleted by HTML5 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: H73 `summary` is obsoleted by HTML5 John Foliot (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: H73 `summary` is obsoleted by HTML5 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
CfC: Ruby changes Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Ruby changes John Foliot (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Ruby changes Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
CfC: Consider SMIL Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 August)
- RE: Consider SMIL Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Consider SMIL John Foliot (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Consider SMIL Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
CfC: Issue 207 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 August)
- RE: Issue 207 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 207 John Foliot (Wednesday, 24 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 207 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 29 August)
Minutes for WCAG Call August 23, 2016 Mike Elledge (Tuesday, 23 August)
Minutes of the Silver Subgroup meeting of 23 August 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 23 August)
Silver Design Process goals survey Jeanne Spellman (Monday, 22 August)
- Re: Silver Design Process goals survey Jeanne Spellman (Monday, 29 August)
- Re: Silver Design Process goals survey Mike Elledge (Monday, 29 August)
- Re: Silver Design Process goals survey Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 30 August)
- Re: Silver Design Process goals survey Mike Elledge (Monday, 29 August)
Error in response to PDF3 public comment Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 22 August)
WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 22 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 22 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Joshue O Connor (Monday, 22 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 23 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Sarah Horton (Tuesday, 23 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Greg Lowney (Tuesday, 23 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 John Foliot (Tuesday, 23 August)
WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Joshue O Connor (Sunday, 21 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Joshue O Connor (Monday, 22 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 23, 2016 Joshue O Connor (Monday, 22 August)
Minutes of the Silver Subgroup meeting of 19 August 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Friday, 19 August)
CfC: Issue 215 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 16 August)
- RE: Issue 215 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 16 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 215 David MacDonald (Thursday, 18 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 215 Wayne Dick (Thursday, 18 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 215 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 22 August)
CfC: Issue 220 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 16 August)
- RE: Issue 220 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 16 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 220 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 22 August)
CfC: Issue 209 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 16 August)
- RE: Issue 209 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 16 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 209 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 22 August)
CfC: Issue 216 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 16 August)
- RE: Issue 216 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 16 August)
- Re: CfC: Issue 216 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 22 August)
Minutes of Silver subgroup meeting of 16 August 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 16 August)
Comment about SMIL Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 15 August)
- Re: Comment about SMIL josh@interaccess.ie (Saturday, 20 August)
- RE: Comment about SMIL White, Jason J (Saturday, 20 August)
- Re[2]: Comment about SMIL josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 22 August)
WCAG Agenda August 16, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 15 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 16, 2016 Jonathan Avila (Monday, 15 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 16, 2016 Shawn Lauriat (Monday, 15 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 16, 2016 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 16 August)
Re[2]: Checklist for Proposals josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 15 August)
- RE: Re[2]: Checklist for Proposals White, Jason J (Monday, 15 August)
- RE: Re[2]: Checklist for Proposals Joshue O Connor (Monday, 15 August)
Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles White, Jason J (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles ALAN SMITH (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles White, Jason J (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles White, Jason J (Thursday, 11 August)
- Re: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Adam Zerner (Friday, 12 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 12 August)
- Re: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Adam Zerner (Friday, 12 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles White, Jason J (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles White, Jason J (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles Jonathan Avila (Friday, 12 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles White, Jason J (Friday, 12 August)
- RE: Proposed SC: Unique Titles - or - Unique & Updated Titles ALAN SMITH (Thursday, 11 August)
Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Mike Elledge (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Mike Elledge (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Mike Elledge (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Mike Elledge (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Jonathan Avila (Thursday, 11 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: Clarification of SC 1.2.3 Mike Elledge (Wednesday, 10 August)
CfC: Checklist for Proposals Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Checklist for Proposals Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Checklist for Proposals White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Checklist for Proposals Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 11 August)
CfC: Success Criteria Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Success Criteria Requirements ALAN SMITH (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Success Criteria Requirements Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: CfC: Success Criteria Requirements Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Success Criteria Requirements White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Success Criteria Requirements Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 11 August)
CfC: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force ALAN SMITH (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force ALAN SMITH (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: CfC: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: CfC: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 August)
- Re: CfC: Accessibility Conformance Testing Task Force Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 11 August)
Minutes for WCAG call Aug 9, 2016 David MacDonald (Tuesday, 9 August)
template for new SC lisa.seeman (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: template for new SC Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 8 August)
- Fwd: template for new SC lisa.seeman (Monday, 8 August)
What should we do with a long success criteria? lisa.seeman (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: What should we do with a long success criteria? Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: What should we do with a long success criteria? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: Re: What should we do with a long success criteria? lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re[3]: What should we do with a long success criteria? josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 15 August)
- RE: Re[3]: What should we do with a long success criteria? White, Jason J (Monday, 15 August)
- Re[3]: What should we do with a long success criteria? josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 15 August)
- Re: Re: What should we do with a long success criteria? lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: What should we do with a long success criteria? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 8 August)
WCAG Agenda August 9, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Sunday, 7 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 9, 2016 Laura Carlson (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 9, 2016 Wayne Dick (Tuesday, 9 August)
WCAG Agenda August 9, 2016 Michael Cooper (Sunday, 7 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 9, 2016 Laura Carlson (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 9, 2016 Shawn Lauriat (Monday, 8 August)
Volunteers needed for 3 comments Andrew Kirkpatrick (Sunday, 7 August)
- Re: Volunteers needed for 3 comments Adam Solomon (Sunday, 7 August)
- Re: Volunteers needed for 3 comments John Foliot (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: Volunteers needed for 3 comments Wayne Dick (Tuesday, 9 August)
Examples of Unexpected Changes from Focus and Form Input? Mike Elledge (Thursday, 4 August)
Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria White, Jason J (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria White, Jason J (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria White, Jason J (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria lisa.seeman (Thursday, 4 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria White, Jason J (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria lisa.seeman (Thursday, 4 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria White, Jason J (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Sailesh Panchang (Tuesday, 9 August)
- RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria White, Jason J (Tuesday, 9 August)
- Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Fwd: Re: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria lisa.seeman (Monday, 8 August)
Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines David MacDonald (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Thursday, 4 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria Best Practice Guidelines Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 2 August)
Success Criteria guidance Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Mike Elledge (Tuesday, 2 August)
- RE: Success Criteria guidance EA Draffan (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Success Criteria guidance ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Success Criteria guidance ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Success Criteria guidance White, Jason J (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 3 August)
- RE: Success Criteria guidance ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Success Criteria guidance Greg Lowney (Friday, 5 August)
- RE: Success Criteria guidance ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 3 August)
Minutes for WCAG WG 8/2 Wayne Dick (Tuesday, 2 August)
WCAG Agenda August 2, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 1 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 2, 2016 Sarah Horton (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: WCAG Agenda August 2, 2016 Marc Johlic (Tuesday, 2 August)
Silver Subgroup minutes of 29 July 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Friday, 29 July)
Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 John Foliot (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Eric Eggert (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Janina Sajka (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Detlev Fischer (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald (Friday, 29 July)
- RE: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Color Contrast and Transparency | WCAG 2.1 Janina Sajka (Thursday, 28 July)
Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 27 July)
- RE: Parallax and vestibular disorders Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders David MacDonald (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Thad C (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Laura Carlson (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Mike Elledge (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Laura Carlson (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Thad C (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Wayne Dick (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Wayne Dick (Saturday, 30 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 31 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 2 August)
- RE: Parallax and vestibular disorders White, Jason J (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 3 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Eric Eggert (Thursday, 4 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Laura Carlson (Thursday, 4 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Monday, 8 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 10 August)
- RE: Parallax and vestibular disorders White, Jason J (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 2 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 4 August)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 31 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Wayne Dick (Saturday, 30 July)
- Re: Parallax and vestibular disorders Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 28 July)
Minutes from July 26 WCAG call Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 27 July)
Minutes of Silver Subgroup meeting 26 July 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 26 July)
Communications Survey Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 25 July)
WCAG Agenda July 26, 2016 - Updated Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 25 July)
- RE: WCAG Agenda July 26, 2016 - Updated Kathy Wahlbin (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: WCAG Agenda July 26, 2016 - Updated Sarah Horton (Monday, 25 July)
WCAG Agenda July 26, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 25 July)
(WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Saturday, 23 July)
Revise reference to "PDA" in example of Keyboard interface David MacDonald (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Revise reference to "PDA" in example of Keyboard interface White, Jason J (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Revise reference to "PDA" in example of Keyboard interface Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 22 July)
Just to clarify: 2.1 is extension, Silver is Rewrite? Wayne Dick (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Just to clarify: 2.1 is extension, Silver is Rewrite? Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 22 July)
Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Léonie Watson (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? White, Jason J (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? John Foliot (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? lisa.seeman (Sunday, 24 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? John Foliot (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? White, Jason J (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Léonie Watson (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Friday, 22 July)
- RE: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald (Friday, 22 July)
Silver Subgroup update and minutes of 21 July 2015 teleconference Jeanne Spellman (Thursday, 21 July)
‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? White, Jason J (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? White, Jason J (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC for WCAG 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 21 July)
[FYI] Quickref bugfix update Eric Eggert (Thursday, 21 July)
RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion Katie Haritos-Shea (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion Katie Haritos-Shea (Thursday, 21 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - Techniques Discussion David MacDonald (Thursday, 21 July)
Guidance for TF-submitted Success Criteria Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: Guidance for TF-submitted Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: Guidance for TF-submitted Success Criteria Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 20 July)
RE: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? - NEW Should we leverage AAPIs? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
Minutes 19 July 2016 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L. (Tuesday, 19 July)
Possible Lisbon 2017 TPAC Hotels Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Possible Lisbon 2017 TPAC Hotels Shawn Lauriat (Tuesday, 19 July)
(WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? josh@interaccess.ie (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Sailesh Panchang (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? josh@interaccess.ie (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Wayne Dick (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? John Foliot (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Re[2]: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace "programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"? David MacDonald (Friday, 22 July)
Numbering Scheme for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Numbering Scheme for WCAG 2.1 White, Jason J (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Numbering Scheme for WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald (Tuesday, 19 July)
WCAG Agenda July 19, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: WCAG Agenda July 19, 2016 Mike Elledge (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: WCAG Agenda July 19, 2016 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 19 July)
WCAG Agenda July 19, 2016 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Monday, 18 July)
Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Joshue O Connor (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Joshue O Connor (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re[4]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 White, Jason J (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- Re[4]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
- Re[2]: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Automated A11y non-issues and SC Parsing 4.1.1 Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Alastair Campbell (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Tuesday, 19 July)
- RE: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features White, Jason J (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Avoid disrupting working accessibility features Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
New SC: Meaningful element name Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: New SC: Meaningful element name White, Jason J (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name David MacDonald (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name Alastair Campbell (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: New SC: Meaningful element name Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: New SC: Meaningful element name Sailesh Panchang (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: New SC: Meaningful element name Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? Kurt Mattes (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? White, Jason J (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? John Foliot (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: Should WCAG explicitly talk about *mainstream* assistive technologies? White, Jason J (Friday, 15 July)
Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? John Foliot (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 14 July)
- RE: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 20 July)
- RE: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 20 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
- RE: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? John Foliot (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 15 July)
- Re[2]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 15 July)
- Re[4]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Re[4]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Re[4]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? John Foliot (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: Re[4]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Re[4]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Sailesh Panchang (Friday, 15 July)
- Re[4]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: Re[2]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 15 July)
- Re[2]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Wayne Dick (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? John Foliot (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? John Foliot (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Wayne Dick (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 15 July)
proposed success criteria lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: proposed success criteria David MacDonald (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: proposed success criteria Thad C (Wednesday, 13 July)
Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? Eric Eggert (Wednesday, 13 July)
- RE: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 13 July)
- RE: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? White, Jason J (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
- RE: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? White, Jason J (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Thursday, 14 July)
- RE: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? John Foliot (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? John Foliot (Monday, 18 July)
- RE: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? White, Jason J (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Should WCAG2.1 provide requirements or guidance on buttons vs. links? David MacDonald (Monday, 18 July)
Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 13 July)
- RE: Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 13 July)
- RE: Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 13 July)
- RE: Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: Responsive tables and accessibility Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Responsive tables and accessibility Steve Faulkner (Tuesday, 12 July)
RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 12 July)
Replying to Github issues by email Léonie Watson (Tuesday, 12 July)
RE: [w3c/wcag] Technique G183 not applicable to touch/inputs that lack hover/focus (#201) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: [w3c/wcag] Technique G183 not applicable to touch/inputs that lack hover/focus (#201) David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? James Nurthen (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 13 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? John Foliot (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Mike Elledge (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Mike Elledge (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? John Foliot (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? Mike Elledge (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: 1.4.2 audio control, do we want to require the stop mechanism to be more discoverable? David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
Technique G183 not applicable to touch/inputs that lack hover/focus Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 11 July)
Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities josh@interaccess.ie (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities David Sloan (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities Rochford, John (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities lisa.seeman (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities David Sloan (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities EA Draffan (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities White, Jason J (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
- RE: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities White, Jason J (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities Bernard R.M. (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Ethics of user testing and people with cognitive disabilities David MacDonald (Tuesday, 12 July)
User testing with user with cognitive disability David MacDonald (Sunday, 10 July)
- Re: User testing with user with cognitive disability lisa.seeman (Sunday, 10 July)
- triplicate mails to same list (was Re: User testing with user with cognitive disability) Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 10 July)
- Re: triplicate mails to same list (was Re: User testing with user with cognitive disability) David MacDonald (Sunday, 10 July)
User testing with person with Cognitive disability David MacDonald (Sunday, 10 July)
- Re: User testing with person with Cognitive disability lisa.seeman (Sunday, 10 July)
- Re: User testing with person with Cognitive disability Bernard R.M. (Sunday, 10 July)
- Re: User testing with person with Cognitive disability David MacDonald (Sunday, 10 July)
- Re: User testing with person with Cognitive disability Bernard R.M. (Sunday, 10 July)
test with a user who had a cognitive disability David MacDonald (Sunday, 10 July)
WCAG Agenda July 12th 2016 josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 8 July)
- Re: WCAG Agenda July 12th 2016 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 12 July)
Re: Fwd: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... lisa.seeman (Thursday, 7 July)
University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures David MacDonald (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures John Foliot (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures John Foliot (Friday, 8 July)
- Re: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures David MacDonald (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures John Foliot (Friday, 8 July)
- Re: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures David MacDonald (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: University of Illinois automated tool WCAG failures Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 8 July)
Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... John Foliot (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... White, Jason J (Wednesday, 6 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... David MacDonald (Monday, 11 July)
- RE: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... White, Jason J (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Should 2.4.4 require Link text or ACCNAME, rather than enclosing sentence etc... James Nurthen (Wednesday, 6 July)
Should SC 2.4.4 require Link text or Accessible Name, rather than enclosing sentence etc.? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Should SC 2.4.4 require Link text or Accessible Name, rather than enclosing sentence etc.? Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 6 July)
User agent SCs? Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: User agent SCs? josh@interaccess.ie (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: User agent SCs? Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re[2]: User agent SCs? josh@interaccess.ie (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: User agent SCs? Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: User agent SCs? Steve Faulkner (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re[2]: User agent SCs? josh@interaccess.ie (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: User agent SCs? Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 6 July)
- RE: User agent SCs? White, Jason J (Wednesday, 6 July)
WCAG WG Meeting Minutes July 5, 2016 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 5 July)
WCAG-ACTION-329: And awk to work out a way to deal with definition changes. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 5 July)
WCAG-ACTION-328: Discuss need for definition changes in wcag at editors meet. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 5 July)
Regrets for tomorrow's meeting Mike Elledge (Monday, 4 July)
Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Steve Faulkner (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 5 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Steve Faulkner (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Adam Solomon (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Jonathan Avila (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
- 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- RE: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Léonie Watson (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- RE: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Jonathan Avila (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Wayne Dick (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 12 July)
- 1100% may be physically impossible and still not achieve the results on smaller monitors ALAN SMITH (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 5 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 5 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content David MacDonald (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Monday, 4 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 4 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 7 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 7 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 8 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Friday, 8 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Detlev Fischer (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Friday, 8 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 7 July)
- RE: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content White, Jason J (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Jonathan's concern: Zoom in responsive drops content Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 7 July)
Responsive sites dropping content David MacDonald (Monday, 4 July)
WCAG Agenda July 5th 2016 josh@interaccess.ie (Friday, 1 July)
Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)
- Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)
- RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop White, Jason J (Friday, 1 July)
- Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)
- Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop Sailesh Panchang (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop David MacDonald (Friday, 1 July)
- RE: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop White, Jason J (Friday, 1 July)
Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2016 15:42:34 UTC