Minutes of Silver Sub-group teleconference of 30 August 2016

HTML Minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html
Text of Minutes
 [1]W3C
 [1] http://www.w3.org/
 - DRAFT -
 Silver subgroup
30 Aug 2016
 See also: [2]IRC log
 [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-irc
Attendees
 Present
 AWK, jeanne, Sarah, Shawn
 Regrets
 Chair
 SV_MEETING_CHAIR
 Scribe
 jeanne
Contents
 * [3]Topics
 1. [4]New info on wiki
 * [5]Summary of Action Items
 * [6]Summary of Resolutions
 __________________________________________________________
New info on wiki
 [7]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 [7] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 [8]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 [8] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 Overview of all the Methods
 [9]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 [9] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 [10]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Designing_Silver -< Home
 [10] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Designing_Silver
 [11]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Pr
 ocess <- Master list of methods
 [11] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process
 [12]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option <- 1st
 Option: Design Driven
 [12] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Design_Driven_Option
 Sarah: Need a comparison document
 Shawn: Tie it back to the goals.
 <SarahHorton> Shawn: Back to ranking, looking at Low Cost
 <SarahHorton> Jeanne: Will need volunteer with experience to
 help design survey
 <SarahHorton> ACTION: Jeanne will explore possible partners for
 survey [recorded in
 [13]http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html#action01]
 [13] http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html#action01]
 Low Cost option will be items that can be done with no budget
 but could be finished within two years.
 <SarahHorton> Sarah: Some low cost options will have narrower
 scope and rigor
 Secondary research in the Low cost option will have a narrow
 scope
 Sarah: when does the scope become so low that it really isn't
 worth doing, there is no value to it.
 Shawn: Analysis is needed for every option, because we need to
 be able to write the report, We will do them differently in
 each option.
 Sarah: We can leave it as high, but we need to point out that
 it won't be as inclusive or as well thought out.
 Jeanne: I think we should split off the grouping.
 ... We have to do some report
 Shawn: It will be more limited
 ... Ideation: the Face to Face could be a teleconference voice
 to voice.
 Sarah: Online workshop would be low impact because we wouldn't
 have time to engage the people
 Shawn: medium for Voting and high for choice by the Subgroup
 Jeanne: I think the user journeys and desireability are likely
 to happen, the others are too time-consuming
 Sarah: If we force people to choose a single response we could
 get useful data for Desireability Testing
 ... Refine prototype -- if we are keeping the cost low, we
 probably wouldn't do much.
 Jeanne: voting: Who would vote, how would it work? it would
 take a lot of effort to promote something enough to get people
 to vote. I have real doubts about this.
 Sarah: Establishing Resources and Partnerships, and taksforce
 would be high. And Hiring an editor would be low.
 Jeanne: crowdourcing is not low cost. Software has to be
 developed or purchased. There is a cost of maintaining it and
 protecting it from trolls.
 ... Writing workshop is a higher cost because of travel.
 Creation by individual writers is the status quo.
 Sarah: Jeanne could reach out to the new version of RDWG to ask
 for help in creating a professional survey.
Summary of Action Items
 [NEW] ACTION: Jeanne will explore possible partners for survey
 [recorded in
 [14]http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html#action01]
 [14] http://www.w3.org/2016/08/30-silver-minutes.html#action01
Summary of Resolutions
 [End of minutes]
 __________________________________________________________