-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
Add typing to Pool.acquire
#1209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Open
+14
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Nov 4, 2024
elprans
elprans
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
@elprans Could you retrigger the CI so this can get merged? The failure is a flake and I don't have retriggering rights.
jmehnle
commented
Jan 3, 2025
@elprans: ping
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that #1197 landed I could take the patch I suggested in #578 and add some more minor changes.
Therefore, this closes #578 and closes #521
In the long run, this will probably cause issues.
Proxies
can't really be expressed that well on the type level, so we will probably get a lot of "Unknown attribute" errors on everything that is using whatever comes out ofacquire()
.However, I would personally advise not to worry about this too much. Let's first add typing to those places where we know it will work in incremental steps and consider larger issues when we have some more experience with adding the types.
We'll likely also run into issues identified in #577 but as long as we don't add any typing that is incorrect this can still be solved.
There is (obviously) one behaviour change with the assert, but as I read the code (and tests) I don't think that should be an actual change in behaviour.