Wouldn't one need to get locks, while for the other getting locks would be just pure overhead? On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 12:56:30PM -0700, per@bothner.com wrote: > Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> writes: >> > In some situations it is useful for a CNI "jobject" and a JNI > > "jobject" to be different. For instance, this is the case if we have > > a precise, copying collector that doesn't have the ability to lock > > down an object. >> I don't get it. How does having two kinds of jobject help? > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/