CNI namespace

Mon Apr 3 14:08:00 GMT 2000

ks@micky.rgv.hp.com writes:
> Wouldn't one need to get locks, while for the other getting locks would
> be just pure overhead?

Huh? I suspect you misunderstood Tom's comment.
I wrote:
> I don't get it. How does having two kinds of jobject help?

I thought of one possibility: You have a jni jobject that is some
kind of indirect handle, while for cni jobject (assuming you have
a gc-aware G++) you can use the java::lang"::Object pointer directly.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/