Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> writes: > In some situations it is useful for a CNI "jobject" and a JNI > "jobject" to be different. For instance, this is the case if we have > a precise, copying collector that doesn't have the ability to lock > down an object. I don't get it. How does having two kinds of jobject help? -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/