Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Auto-archiving period: 31 days 
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Organized crime project discussion pages (now redirects here):

Serial killer task force discussion (now redirects here):

Terrorism task force discussions (now redirects here):



This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.


Notability of kidnappings and attempted kidnappings

[edit ]

I recently had a draft rejected for the follwing reason [1]:

"unsuccessful assassinations or kidnappings are not notable on Wikipedia unless of a high degree or involves personalities who have a page on Wikipedia - it is not similar to an assassination/kidnapping plot of a popular world leader (US, Australia, Brazil) that would draw worldwide attraction. Lastly, why the article is "rejected" is because the victim of the kidnapping plot does not even have a page on Wikipedia which otherwise would have qualified for a merge."

Is this the applicable standard? In this draft article, the intended victim was a somewhat obscure government official, the perpetrators were conspiracy theorists, the plot was utterly ludicrous, however it did receive significant coverage in reliable sources in the UK, and in local media where the crime took place. Footage of the crime and the judgment were broadcast on the UK's Sky News (a news-corp subsidiary).

Perhaps I'm out of touch with standards, but this really does look like a notable subject. Should I continue editing this article or give up?

Salimfadhley (talk) 02:05, 23 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Salimfadhley That is a poor decline rationale, and we have no such rules about kidnapping plots to my knowledge. Those types of crimes absolutely can be notable in some circumstances, and there are no crimes that are always notable. The issue is this specific case does not have great sourcing, Sky News is not reliable and the coverage is not in depth. For notability for this kind of thing, read WP:NEVENT. I do not think this particular topic is notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Thanks, on that basis, unless I can find some better sources I will leave this topic alone. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Good article reassessment for Criminal damage in English law

[edit ]

Criminal damage in English law has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lucy Letby#Requested move 21 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Zizians#Requested move 2 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 14:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Deptford Poisoning Cases#Requested move 22 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath talk 10:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Palm Sunday massacre (homicide)#Requested move 22 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath talk 12:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2006 Yemen prison escape#Requested move 4 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Good article reassessment for Lois Riess

[edit ]

Lois Riess has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Tenpop421 (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Discussion at Talk:Phil Spector

[edit ]

There's a discussion on how we should format the the first paragraph on the lead section of the Phil Spector article, which can be found at Talk:Phil Spector#"Convicted murderer" in lead section. Feedback from project members would be appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Algiers Motel killings#Requested move 17 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Murder of Paul Anlauf and Franz Lenck#Requested move 6 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /