Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Place to request autopatrolled rights
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Please read Wikipedia:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created at least 25 new articles on the English Wikipedia, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. These articles should be free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede 66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede 66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac , the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede 66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede 66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
+1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection).

I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

—Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@NaveenNkadalaveni: (Non-administrator comment) Please add your reason for requesting autopatrolled rights. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:44, 4 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I've created 37 articles main JP-related articles. Seven including Huwie Ishizaki appeared in DYK. (Though, I only discovered DYK later in July), Huwie Ishizaki is both WP:GAN and on queue in DYK (will release tomorrow when I'm writing this). None of my articles are deleted all of them are well-sourced.

My earlier stuffs are a bit short (e.g. Shōgo Yasukawa, Yoshinobu Yamakawa) and the earlier pages I created are stubs (N56 highway (Philippines), Urdaneta–Dagupan Road). In total, 6 of my articles are stubs. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

With over 45 live articles created, I believe that my experience on Wikipedia can positively contribute to patrol community. In addition, I believe that this right will also accord me more opportunity to grow. I hope i am given a chance. Thank you. Mevoelo (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Based on the XTools link in your nomination, you've had at least four of your creations deleted at AfD in the past six months for notability issues. That and your nomination statement leads me to believe that your work still requires scrutiny from new pages patrol. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I came across this user while reviewing articles in NPP. They are an infrequent new article author, but have a clear understanding of notability and reliable sources, in addition to being a major contributor to several quality articles. A few sparse concerns about the use of copyrighted images were quickly corrected when notified, and they have been invited to NPP previously. Recon rabbit 18:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /