Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Bora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Not a vote If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote , but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or{{subst:csp|sock username|sockmaster username}}.
Neha Bora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails NPOL and GNG. Coverage is limited to routine reporting on recent events and organizational activities, mostly focused on an incident 2026 Delhi Jantar Mantar protests. There is no clear evidence of significant independent coverage demonstrating the subject's notability. Pasados (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Keep : Not just routine, several sources have given detailed information about her. Passes WP:GNG. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply
she is legit real protestor, i know many people will defy this only because it doesn't fit their agenda . it is a fact that she was on a hunger strike for NEET paper leak . ~2026-41536-13 (talk) 19:06, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply
She might be a legitimate protestor but she faked her injuries in the protest. While on the protest day, she told that she was hurt so badly rendering her unable to even walk, in a just a 3-4 days, on the resignation of Dharmender Pradhan, she was dancing to the tunes of Chaiyya Chaiyya :) ~2026-41599-10 (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply
Faked?? And who are you to deny her situation, also any rational being would understand the depth of agony one would undergo whilst in a hunger strike not for 6 days, not for 10 but for 20 plus days!! And you would question her undergone's, 3 or 4 days after she broke her fast? Why, why soomuch misinformation and hate, we love you all do we have our hopes with you we bet on you please deside rationally she fought for my future and your future my family and your family, we are one nation we are one people why be divided of hate let's be happy may God give you the best of day. ~2026-42191-18 (talk) 04:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC) reply
Keep please ~2026-41880-02 (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2026 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The lack of other notable events could also be due to media bias toward the ruling party. If someone raises their voice, the media’s first response is often to shame them and to question their religious or political stance. Considering that she is the President of the All India Students' Association, and that the organization has previously spoken out on behalf of students and education, she should be considered an activist as an extension of the organization. Recently, with her appearing in more news debates [1] , even after the 2026 Delhi Jantar Mantar protests has been called off, reinforces the view that she is an active and vocal activist; therefore, her page should not be deleted. --Tapree0 (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply
Controversies apart. She is a youth icon and has harnessed a considerable social media following and is widely accepted among the youth in India as their voice. Information about her is valuable for the purpose of relevance of Wikipedia as a information hub of important figures in the Indian Political landscape. If this information isnt available, automstically AI will be redirected away from Wiki searches and towards other credible sources. If a lot of such accounts are deleted, then wikipedia ceases to be relevant. Ajish.philip (talk) 09:11, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply
@Ajish.philip Yes. Your point is very valuable. I have seen many editors or reviewer nominating articles of left-wing activists. But with much less information, many people from the right wing (many of them are from USA) have article in Wikipedia. I am not bringing political discourse. But this issue has to be discussed in detail. Btw nowadays most media is also too much biased to the rulling parties. So Wikipedia has to think about this.
@Ech0mach@NesaraNesara@Srinivasrjy@Tapree0@Aloist@Mr. Rasel Hasan XYZ 250706 (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC) reply
Delete this article is made to defame the Indian government ~2026-41596-21 (talk) 15:57, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply
Keep and who are you to deny her situation, also any rational being would understand the depth of agony one would undergo whilst in a hunger strike not for 6 days, not for 10 but for 20 plus days!! And you would question her undergone's, 3 or 4 days after she broke her fast? Why, why soomuch misinformation and hate, we love you all do we have our hopes with you we bet on you please deside rationally she fought for my future and your future my family and your family, we are one nation we are one people why be divided of hate let's be happy may God give you the best of day. ~2026-42191-18 (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2026 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - she is among india's most talked about person regarding protests in today's world. many international press has also reported her. and there would be multiple updates coming sooner to the page.
Adnan Raz.B (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply

No need to delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-41708-85 (talk) 08:49, 28 July 2026 (UTC) reply

no need to delete ~2026-41914-14 (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC) reply
Everything looks fine, Deletion is not required.
@ ~2026-42191-18 (talk) 04:21, 29 July 2026 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /