Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Tuck
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Donnie Tuck
[edit ][Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Donnie Tuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )
Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NPOL, as all coverage is WP:MILL, and he is a local politician. Wikipedia is not a politics database. I am also nominating George E. Wallace (Virginia politician) for the same reason, as the former mayor of the same city. -1ctinus📝 🗨 15:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Delete: Attends conferences [1] and election news [2], mostly local press coverage. Nothing for notability that i can see. Oaktree b (talk) 16:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Virginia. Shellwood (talk) 17:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Delete Local officials are not automatically considered notable, and the WP:ROTM coverage cited on the page doesn't exactly convince me that he passes GNG. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.