User talk:Smconner77

Welcome!

Hello, Smconner77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Fullstop (talk) 09:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, in your creation of the Electrochemical Printing article you indicated that it was a work in progress. So as to not leave an unfinished page in article space, I've temporarily moved it to your personal sandbox. Feel free to move it back when its ready (or give me a nudge if you need help). Thanks. -- Fullstop (talk) 09:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pull Platforms was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 21:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pull Platforms. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. My76Strat (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

Pull Platforms you submitted has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! My76Strat (talk) 03:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pull platform is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull platform until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

My submission is no different than this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baan_Kamlangchay It would only seem fair that if mine is rejected that this one should also be rejected, no? 2405:9800:B911:2816:24C8:2B9D:FF0F:C510 (talk) 07:36, 29 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

My sourcing is more in depth and more numerous than this other article. Sean Matthew Conner (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Understood. I'll fix it. Sean Matthew Conner (talk) 09:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, Smconner77. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "VivoCare".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Smconner77. Thank you for your work on Tom Kitwood. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, I reviewed this and its now in article-space. I think it needs an image.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep Talk  18:35, 2 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC