User talk:Mikeycdiamond

I noticed this and wondered about the mention of LLM. How is that determined? (Please enable your email.) You might also check the editing patterns and notice a huge dependence on primary .gov sources, IOW possibly classic OR and inability to determine the proper due weight to assign to the content due to the lack of origination in primary .gov sources. The later adding of secondary sourcing doesn't necessarily fix the problem. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:03, 16 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Determining LLM use is subjective; you can't really prove it. If I was wrong, you should resubmit it. What made me suspicious was the bolding of "278,000 searches" and the use of em dashes. Also, I would prefer if we kept any conversations on-wiki. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 21:32, 16 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks! Also, have you been accumulating names all year for your Christmas list, and how did you get all these names? I don't mean to sound rude, but I am curious. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 19:17, 18 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply ]

• Wikipedians who opt out of ACE messages