User talk:AdOpsEditor

Information icon Hello, I'm MrOllie. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you for the note, MrOllie. I appreciate the guidance. I've replaced the flagged citation on the Digital display advertising article with a publicly accessible report from the Association of National Advertisers (ANA). AdOpsEditor (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, AdOpsEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia ! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 19:27, 27 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you for the detailed feedback, CNMall41. I have declared my conflict of interest on my user page and am working to improve the draft. Could you help clarify what specific types of sources would satisfy the notability requirement for this article? The platform has been covered by the Financial Times and The Globe and Mail, and was recently featured in AdTech Juice. I want to ensure I'm pursuing the right sources before resubmitting. AdOpsEditor (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

• User talk pages with conflict of interest notices
• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC