Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Walter Dix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article Walter Dix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 3, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 20, 2009 .
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that American sprinter Walter Dix won two bronze medals at the 2008 Beijing Olympics but hardly competed at all in 2009 due to injury and a legal dispute with his agent?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page .
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon Olympics Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Athletics Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Running Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:
  1. tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running }}
  2. adding assessment and importance parameters when missing
  3. find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs
  4. adopt an article and promote it to GA

Height

[edit ]

[1] lists Dix at 5'11". I realize that sometimes the official numbers are inflated, but there needs to be a citation for the 5'7" remark. Jairuscobb (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

GA Review

[edit ]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Walter Dix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on September 29, 2009. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.

I'll be reviewing this article for GA.--Giants 27(c|s) 20:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

I strongly suggest you add the alt text, but since everything else checks out, I'll pass the article. Nice work!--Giants 27(c|s) 02:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.
[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Walter Dix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walter Dix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 9 May 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

Some issues

[edit ]

I noticed there is a 'citation needed' warning for his birth date. I have also marked three unsourced (sub)sections and one sentence as 'clarification needed'. – Editør (talk) 23:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /