Talk:Potential evapotranspiration

WikiProject icon This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject icon Climate change Low‐importance

Section sizes Section size for Potential evapotranspiration (10 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 2,978 2,978 Measurements 1,838 1,838 Estimates of potential evaporation 42 6,821 Thornthwaite equation (1948) 1,769 1,769 Penman equation (1948) 453 453 FAO 56 Penman–Monteith equation (1998) 1,815 1,815 Priestley–Taylor equation 2,742 2,742 See also 158 158 References 788 788 External links 222 222 Total 12,805 12,805

Three different types of evapotranspiration exist: Reference evapotranspiration (ET_ref), Potential evapotranspiration (ET_pot) and Actual evapotranpiration (ET_act). The reference evapotranspiration is (based on the definition of FAO publication 56; written in an attempt to standardize the evapotranspiration equations) defined as the evapotranspiration of a standard grass (with defined albedo, bulk surface resistance and aerodymanic resistance) with an unlimited supply of water. Since the evapotranspiration rates of ground surfaces with a soil cover different than grass can very from the standard grass cover, a potential evapotranspiration can be calculated for a specific soil cover. For most agricultural crops, the relation between grass evaporation (under unlimited water supply conditions) and the specific crop has been defined through the use of crop coefficients. For a cotton crop, at full development, the potential evapotranspiration is approximately 1.2 times higher than that for grass.

The step from potential evapotranspiration to actual evapotranspiration includes multiple stress factors, the main one ususally being the shortage of water supply (others like salinity stress, temperature stress, fertility shortage). A stress factor thus reduces the potential evapotranspiration of a crop to an actual evapotranspiration.

Reference evapotranspiration is commonly calculated using the climatic inputs for solar radiation, temperature, humidity and windspeed. Several relations exist between these parameters (among which the Blainy-Criddle, the Penman, the Penman-Monteith equations) and the reference evapotranspiration, and all of these relations are empirical. A more theoretical definition of the reference evapotranspiration was developed using the theoretical grass cover [equation published in FAO 56 {eq3?}].

The actual evapotranspiration of an area can be calculated based on a water balance (common approach) or an energy balance. Based on the energy balance, the potential evapotranspiration can also be calculated, thus providing an alternative method of obtaining a measure for the crop coefficient.

Rwos 11:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Thus, if the above definitions of reference ET and potential ET can be agreed upon, then the current equations on the main page should be under the heading "reference ET". The definition in text is more or less correct, refering to the evaporation assuming a limitless supply of water. Rwos 11:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

The definition of ET_pot in the external link (ag.arizona.edu) does not appear correct. It appears that they have calculated the reference evapotranspiration, since actual ground cover does not seem to be included in the definition.

Another world-wide calculated map of reference evapotranspiration (based on work of the University of Sussex) is also available on the IWMI website (http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/WAtlas/atlas.htm)

Rwos 11:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

All parameters of the equation should be defined in the article without leaving cryptic N's, L's and Ta's lying around. 99.253.108.67 (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

I concur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.225.63.161 (talk) 01:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Potential evaporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301214648/http://www.watershedhydrology.com/pdf/T%26M%20Revisited.pdf to http://www.watershedhydrology.com/pdf/T%26M%20Revisited.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC) [reply ]