Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Pebble (watch)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A fact from Pebble (watch) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
  • Did you know... that the Pebble smartwatch failed to interest traditional investment groups, and then became the most successful project in the history of Kickstarter?
A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pebble E-Paper Watch.
Wikipedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Brands Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject California , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Companies Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Computing Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of watches on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WatchesWikipedia:WikiProject WatchesTemplate:WikiProject WatchesWatches

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Tense?

[edit ]

Why is this article in past-tense? I thought it was policy to write everything in present-tense unless the subject doesn't exist anymore. For instance, the article for Apple I is written in present-tense, but I'm pretty sure more original Pebble watches still currently exist than original Apple I computers. KyLeggiero (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Relation with Google

[edit ]

The last paragraph of the intro section, and the very last section, both mention out of nowhere that Google released the source code. But the article never mentions Google and how it is related to Pebble. Why would Google have access to Pebble's source code and why would it be in a position to take such a decision?

(I found out that Google owns Fitbit which owns Pebble, but I think that this really needs to be mentioned somewhere, this is really confusing as-is) App NS (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /