Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Brands and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Brands , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands

Index 1, 2, 3, 4



This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Should we have an article about.....?

[edit ]

Muriel Cigars?.... I just saw an ad for them on a you tube video about 50s television ads. They seem to have been well known in the United states back then. What do you all think? Thanks and God bless! Antonio El Cajun Martin (Say that again! I dare you to say that again!) 10:24, September 22, 2022 (UTC)

Archive was borked

[edit ]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brands/Archive 3 only has one entry, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brands/Archive 4 has many. Something broke at one point. /Archive 4 needs merging into /Archive 3 and then Archive 4 be deleted, so the autoarchiver won't get confused, and we don't leave empty archives lying around -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 21:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Good article reassessment for Honda Super Cub

[edit ]

Honda Super Cub has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Good article reassessment for MacBook (2006–2012)

[edit ]

MacBook (2006–2012) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 23:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Good article reassessment for Fairbanks Daily News-Miner

[edit ]

Fairbanks Daily News-Miner has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Good article reassessment for Simca Vedette

[edit ]

Simca Vedette has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Advice

[edit ]

I have come across an article Evolve (WWE brand), that seems to duplicate content at WWE Evolve. I didnt think that the brand in itself was notable and have proposed a merge, and in any case the article seems to be less about the brand and more about a tv show. I have found a similar article NXT (WWE brand) that seems less about the brand ad more about the various breakaway tv shows. My question is, are these brand articles legitimate? Flat Out (talk) 04:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /