Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:National Jet Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Jet Express article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Aviation : Airlines
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
B checklist
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: not checked
  2. Coverage and accuracy: not checked
  3. Structure: not checked
  4. Grammar and style: not checked
  5. Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
  • | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no>
  • | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no>
  • | b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no>
  • | b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no>
  • | b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no>
assessing the article against each criterion.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airline project .
WikiProject icon Australia : Adelaide / Transport Low‐importance
WikiProject icon National Jet Express is within the scope of WikiProject Australia , which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject icon Companies Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

fleet lists

[edit ]

There appear to be three overlapping fleet lists in this article (infobox, top of "Fleet" section, and bottom of fleet section). these lists don't appear to match, and none of them have the B727s pictured at [1] and mentioned at http://www.nationaljet.com.au/profile.html. I can't find the right info, or I'd fix it. --Scott Davis Talk 23:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

I also found the fleet list makes no sense. Why is it divided into different sections? Does National Fleet own them all? There should be just one list of the aircraft that National Fleet has, to make it easier to understand. Maybe it could be stated after each aircraft model (in brackets) who it is operating for. Also, the "Surveillance Australia" section lists Q200 and Q300 aircraft which are not listed in the top section. Makes no sense. Plus, with the exception of the Q300, the aircraft listed are all no longer manufactured. Some are real vintage aircraft. Some aircraft, such as the 727, ceased production before the National Jet company was formed in 1989, so they must have acquired them second hand from somewhere. This company is the operator of some old and vintage aircraft! (hey, that should be in the first paragraph on the top of the page) What aircraft do they actually own? 203.217.64.50 22:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Fair use rationale for Image:Njs.PNG

[edit ]

Image:Njs.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Sounds like an advertisement

[edit ]

Was this page written by National Jet themselves? How about this line: "National Jet is the leading provider of contracted aerial passenger and freight services." What does "leading provider" mean? Does it mean it has the most passengers? Best service? Biggest profit? In the end, it is just meaningless advertising drivel. 203.217.64.50 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

this has been removed. Dormskirk (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC) [reply ]

Sloppy writing

[edit ]

"is part of the Cobham Plc group in England."...What does this mean? Is it in some sort of alliance with Cobham in England? Or is National Jet a British owned company?

"It also provides specialist contract aviation services to government and large civil organisations and wet leasing of aircraft and crew including to Qantas under QantasLink." ...the bit about wet leasing doesn't list anyone other than Qantas, so how can it provide "crew including to Qantas" if there is noone else?

"Employing over 800 people, National Jet, through its various contracts, flies to over 50 destinations throughout Australasia." ...how do we know how many are employed? Are they employed by "National Jet" or are they employed by "various contracts", in which case they don't work for National Jet. Are the destinations relevant at all? If this is a "charter airline", as stated, then the destinations are those of the airlines that it contracts to, or whoever hires National Jet aircraft. Therefore, National Jet doesn't really have any destinations. 203.217.64.50 23:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

all these bits have now been removed. Dormskirk (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cobham Aviation Services Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cobham Aviation Services Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

Has been purchased

[edit ]

Has been purchased by Regional Express, (REX) is now being rebranded to National Jet Express. Cobham Search and rescue was bought by another company and is no longer connected (although internally we still use their logistics services at times.) In perth base SAR is based out of Airflite, Regional services (the airline) is still out of the hangar. Aircraft to be repainted to National jet express. 220.235.53.20 (talk) 06:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /