Talk:Liancourt Rocks dispute
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liancourt Rocks dispute article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
| WikiProject icon | Japan Low‐importance | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea , a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea . All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Too long
[edit ]This article quickly devolves into minutiae as both sides keep adding more and more trivia to support their cause. 90.196.142.126 (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yes, it is a bit too long. Any trimming has to be carefully done. Masterhatch (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Over-quoting
[edit ]In its current state, this article consists of too many quotations, many of which are too lengthy with no attempts at proper paraphrasing. Earwig returns an 62.1% similarity with other sites online. That is not to say that this article is 62.1% plagiarised, but that a significant amount of it consists of direct quotations and close paraphrasing. This article would benefit from a careful and gradual community rewrite. Yue 🌙 23:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class Korea-related articles
- High-importance Korea-related articles
- Unstable Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea articles