Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Joe Kraker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articles Joe Kraker has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review : September 18, 2022. (Reviewed version ).
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography , a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Minnesota Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Canada Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from Joe Kraker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joe Kraker.
Wikipedia

GA Review

[edit ]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joe Kraker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Boca Jóvenes (talk · contribs) 22:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello. I will review this. I should be able to start tomorrow. BoJó | talk UTC 22:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello again. This is nearly there except that it needs some more in the lead. I've added a few minor things like the location of the paper and the prepend templates. Basically, the lead should include something about Canadian football and perhaps the bit at the end of the article about him not wearing shoulder pads, which is a potential DYK piece.

As far as the GA criteria is concerned, the article is well-written and well-sourced. It's in scope, has a good image and there are no OR or POV issues. The only problem is the lead being short.

I'll put it on hold but I'm not applying any deadline. Please ping me when you've had chance to look at it. Thanks. BoJó | talk UTC 19:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, BeanieFan11. I certainly do think it's all right. I'm promoting this to WP:GA now. Thanks for your help. Well done and all the best. BoJó | talk UTC 23:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Did you know nomination

[edit ]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 17:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC).[reply ]

ALT looks good. QPQ is done. All set to go. Thriley (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /