Talk:JCall
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
- Did you know... that JCall , a new Middle East advocacy group along the lines of J Street, is founded to lobby the European parliament for a resolution to the Middle East conflict?
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Relevance
[edit ]Ben Gurion St. is relevant to the context here because of the pro/anti-israeli feelings in europe that prompted this foundation, hence the caveat that most members are from franceLihaas (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Has a reliable source made a connection between the incidents related to Ben Gurion St. and JCall? If not, including it in the article is impermissible synthesis. — Malik Shabazz Talk /Stalk 21:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- 1. that's the call for sources (the point of the fact tag)
- 2. it's in the "background" section to give context. WP:Bold and WP:Ignore call for editors to be bold w/o fear of political repercussions. Of course that doesnt mean i think its permanent, if nothing is forthcoming in due course (after a perion of some time with the call) then it must be removed.Lihaas (talk) 23:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- This has nothing to do with "political repercussions"; it has to with WP:SYNTH, part of WP:NOR. It doesn't matter that the incident happened, what matters is whether a RS has connected the incident with JCall. — Malik Shabazz Talk /Stalk 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- as per the [citation needed ] tag, if nothing is forthcoming youre right it must go, but give it some time. the page only just hit 1k views.Lihaas (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- This has nothing to do with "political repercussions"; it has to with WP:SYNTH, part of WP:NOR. It doesn't matter that the incident happened, what matters is whether a RS has connected the incident with JCall. — Malik Shabazz Talk /Stalk 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
uncited material
[edit ]i saw something that said "citation needed" and i wanted to delete this uncited stuff but the page is protected Tommy has a great username (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- C-Class European Union articles
- Mid-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles