Talk:Dawn (brand)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
NPOV?
[edit ]While the facts presented are possibly true, there is little to no content presented neutrally. In addition, this is more about the practices of the manufacturer instead of and societal impact from the brand.Loftwyr (talk) 13:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
Reformulation =
[edit ]Seems like P&G heavily reformulated Dawn a few years ago, making it nearly useless as a detergent - my wife swore by Dawn before, now she swears at Dawn. Anyone have any links to content about this change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.160.182.195 (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Reads like an Advertisement =
[edit ]To me, this article reads like an advertisement for Proctor and Gamble. Does anyone else agree? If so I think the article needs to be really but back. Jasenlee (talk) 03:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Iufhyhh778ehheyg6r23rr6rt6[reply ]
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class home articles
- Unknown-importance home articles
- WikiProject Home Living articles
- Stub-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles