Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Climate of Kosovo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Kosovo Low‐importance
WikiProject icon Climate of Kosovo is part of WikiProject Kosovo , an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Weather : Climate Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather , which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

https://sinjali.com/temperatura-me-e-ulet-ne-kosove-eshte-regjistruar-para-59-vitesh/ Temperatura me e ulet ka qene me 25 janar 1963 ne Gilan, e jo 6 qershor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.99.20.126 (talk) 07:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Settlement names

[edit ]

Statement by one user:

  • Blind renaming of places is probably a bad idea. The source specifically names these places. Can't we stick to what sources say?

Reply:

  • First, we don't revert anything on account of what it is "probably", on an encyclopaedia it is what is "definitely" or nothing at all. Can we stick to what the sources say? For content, yes. For naming, depends. Naturally if a list of names are incorrect in the first place, their amendment neither qualifies as "renaming" and as such it is not "blind", the appropriate term is "correction". And correction cannot probably but can only definitely be a good (削除) idea (削除ここまで) course of action, or rather, the only option. And if we ignore this, we can have selective naming, we can sometimes call the Serbian capital Beograd as some sources call it that way, we can refer to The Hague as Den Haag as that is how some sources refer to it. Naturally if a source on Bristol is published in Welsh, we can call it Bryste. That's not the way Wikipedia works. So, to resolve the problem, if an editor is not sure whether to use Glogovac or Gllogovc, he need only click the blue link and find his title, and whatever it is, that's how to report it. Problem solved. Any appeals, write to the publishers who used Glogovac and complain. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 02:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

Name

[edit ]

As usual, not worthy of a conversation. Article name is Peć. Use it. --WhiteWriter speaks 22:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC) [reply ]

Evlekis, too, suggested that somehow WP:AT prevented the use of piped links (but only selectively; it's mandatory to use piped links when the title of the target article doesn't fit Belgrade's POV). Are you picking up where Evlekis left off? Or do you have some other aversion to using the name given by relevant sources? bobrayner (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
[edit ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Climate of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /