Talk:Biographical evaluation
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
.jpg){kind=link}
shia's view in Ilm Rijal
[edit ]@Sa.vakilian:I wan to add a section about shia's view point on Biographical evaluation and their criterion in the sphere.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
External links modified
[edit ]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Biographical evaluation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090903094955/http://www.salafipublications.com:80/sps/ to http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Requested move 27 March 2020
[edit ]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved — Wug· a·po·des 23:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
Biographical evaluation → Ilm al-rijal – Current title is too broad that it needs to be disambiguated as, for example, "Biographical evaluation (hadith)". The redirect chosen is category-specific and widely attested. Assem Khidhr (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
- This is a contested technical request. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Assem Khidhr: But we need to consider readers who do not know Arabic and do not know all the details of Islam. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Anthony Appleyard: Using an ambiguous term is no considerate to those readers and is rather confusing. It's one possible rendering of the term of which multiple others can be and are already used in relevant scholarly books (See WP:ATDAB). Also, unless there's enough convention and attestation regarding a translated term, using the transliteration, rather than a protologism, as a title for such specific topics is already practiced on wikipedia (See WP:CONSISTENT; e.g. Hadith, Fiqh, Ijma, and others). To help explain these to readers who aren't familiar with such terminology is one reason we have categories and sidebars. Assem Khidhr (talk) 06:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
- Weak oppose We don't have any information about biographical evaluation outside of Islam. Is said general topic notable? –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 05:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC) [reply ]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.