Talk:Berlin Committee

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Is this the same as the 'Indian National Committee', as mentioned in [1],? --Soman (talk) 14:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

It is the same organisation that the sikhpioneers website wishes to indicate, but they have the facts slightly wrong, as the Indian national Committee was actually formed by some members of the Berlin committee before they came to form the Berlin committee. Nonetheless, for practical and historical references, some historians do identify this predecessor organisation with the Berlin committee itself. The Ghadar Conspiracy was between the Ghadar party, Berlin Committee, and the German foreign office (and the Irish republicans). So for practical purposes, yes it is.Hope this clarifies. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 14:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

There was a group in Stockholm called 'Indian National Committee', google search indicates that they were active at least 1917-1918. Would that have been a branch of the same group? --Soman (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Yes, this was a branch of the Berlin Committee (alebeit, supposedly a secret one), the Stockholm group kept in touch with the Mahendra Pratap's Provisional Government and was instrumental in liasing with the German Government and the new Russian bolshevik government. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 14:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

1949 Wipert von Blücher published his book Zeitenwende in Iran. Erlebnisse und Beobachtungen. In it he states that "Das indische Unabhänigkeitskomitee in Berlin" had been founded in the United States and moved to Berlin with the start of World War I. ----130.83.12.163 (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Berlin Committee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718223554/http://newdelhi.daad.de/mainFrame/news/mehrfart5.html to http://newdelhi.daad.de/mainFrame/news/mehrfart5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

Virendranath Chattopadhyaya#Revolutionary vagabond calls this the "Indipendence Committee". Normally I'd put that down as a typo, but I can see how it might be an attempt at a portmanteaux for "Indian Independence". But "Indipendence" isn't mentioned here - is it a term actually used? -- Finlay McWalter ··–·Talk 12:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC) [reply ]