Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Basel Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request

This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)


Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed }} and {{If administrator }}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: 
.ECR-edit-request-warning{
display:none;
}
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
  • All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Palestine Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine , a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Israel Top‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject icon Jewish history Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Israel Palestine Collaboration
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration , a collaborative, bipartisan effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. For guidelines and a participants list see the project page. See also {{Palestine-Israel enforcement }}, the ArbCom-authorized discretionary sanctions, the log of blocks and bans, and Working group on ethnic and cultural edit wars. You can discuss the project at its talk page.Israel Palestine CollaborationWikipedia:WikiProject Israel Palestine CollaborationTemplate:WikiProject Israel Palestine CollaborationIsrael Palestine Collaboration

Bad translation

[edit ]

I am replacing "Zionism seeks to secure for the Jewish people a publicly recognized, legally assured homeland in Palestine." by "Zionism seeks to establish a home in Palestine for the Jewish people, secured under public law."

This change is based on the Protocols of the Congress, starting at page 114. It is not correct that the word "öffentlich" was inserted into the original text. Rather, the word "rechtlish" was replaced by the word "öffentlich-rechtlich". This changed the sentence to "Der Zionismus erstrebt für das jüdische Volk die Schaffung einer öffentlich-rechtlich gesicherten Heimstätte in Palästina." (p119).

"Öffentlich-rechtlich" is a legal word that means "(under) public law". See public law and de:Öffentliches Recht. The background is that some delegates thought that the original "rechtich" (by law) was insufficient and proposed changing it to "völkerrechtlich" (by international law). The president suggested "öffentlich-rechtlich" instead. The committee considered these proposals and concluded that neither added anything to the original text ("thatsächlich nichts ausdrückt, was nicht schon im ursprünglichen Text enthalten wäre"). However, to satisfy the delegates they approved "öffentlich-rechtlich", which was put as a motion and passed by acclamation (p119). In summary, there is nothing about "publicly recognized" in the sentence and the congress did not consider any such thing.

Another thing I changed is to translate Heimstätte as "home", which is more accurate than "homeland". If "homeland" was intended, they would have used "Heimat" or "Heimatland". Zero talk 04:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

(削除) I suspect the translation here is derived from the Hebrew source that was previously given rather than the original German. As we know, two steps of translation can easily produce errors. (削除ここまで) Several more problems I am fixing: Volksbewusstseins is "national consciousness", Regierungszustimmun­g is "government approval" not "government grants". "Gliederung und Zusammenfassung" is "organization and bringing together"; "federation" seems to mean nothing. Veranstaltungen is "events" not "groups". In #1, zweckdienliche meaning "expedient" is missing, it implies these particular occupations are needed in Palestine asap. I'm not sure that Gewerbetreibenden=businessmen is intended, more likely tradesmen, but I didn't change it. Zero talk 05:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

I'll put the whole German text here to assist discussion.

Der Zionismus erstrebt für das jüdische Volk die Schaffung einer öffentlich-rechtlich gesicherten Heimstätte in Palästina.
Zur Erreichung dieses Zieles nimmt der Congress folgende Mittel in Aussicht:
1. Die zweckdienliche Förderung der Besiedlung Palästinas mit jüdischen Ackerbauern, Handwerkern und Gewerbetreibenden.
2. Die Gliederung und Zusammenfassung der gesammten Judenschaft durch geeignete örtliche und allgemeine Veranstaltungen nach den Landesgesetzen.
3. Die Stärkung des jüdischen Volksgefühles und Volksbewusstseins.
4. Vorbereitende Schritte zur Erlangung der Regierungszustimmun­g gen, die nöthig sind, um das Ziel des Zionismus zu erreichen. Zero talk 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Incidentally, in the copy of the protocols here the first four letters of "Volksgefühles" (national sentiment, etc) are crossed out and "Selbst" is written by hand, making "Selbstgefühles" (self-awareness, etc). I can't find anything about it in the protocols, so I've ignored it. Zero talk 05:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Now I noticed that the old translation of the first sentence, but not of the rest, comes from this source (p76), which is not in Hebrew as I thought. I do not believe this is a reliable source; for one it uses "homeland" when the German says "home", but more seriously the author obviously doesn't know that public law is a thing and force-translates the single word "öffentlich-rechtlich" as "pubicly recognised and secured by law". Then he contradicts himself by quoting Nordau that adding "publicly" added nothing that was not there before. Anyway, since we care about sources, I'll note that "home" and "public law" are the translations that appear in a multitude of places. I'll mention a few I found already on my computer: Stein (The Making of Modern Israel, p4), Roberts (Arab-Israeli Conflict, p7), Krämer (A History of Palestine, p110), Patai (The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl, p720), Hadi (Documents on Palestine, p9), Frankl (Theodor Herzl, p159), Geddes (A Documentary History of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, p22), Encyclopaedia Judaica (2ns edn, Vol 21, p562), and several others. Even the propagandistic JVL (which maliciously replaced "Palestine" by "Eretz Israel") has "under public law". Barbour (Nisi Dominus, p46ff) has a discussion. Zero talk 08:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

To this list add the Constitution of the World Zionish Organization. Zero talk 09:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /