Talk:Anglo-Saxon Chronicle

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070423110959/http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/cotton/cotframe.htm to http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/cotton/cotframe.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161018222458/https://parker.stanford.edu/parker/actions/page_turner.do?ms_no=173 to https://parker.stanford.edu/parker/actions/page_turner.do?ms_no=173

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC) [reply ]

"Surviving manuscripts" is unsourced, including the map File:ASC.svg. A455bcd9 (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Now cited. I had to make one change, and there's one slight vagueness I should point out. I dropped the mention of Mercian dialect from the description of the Parker Chronicle; Swanton doesn't mention it, at least in the passage I'm citing, and looking in other sources it's not clear that the Mercian elements continue to 1070 anyway. The vagueness is that Swanton doesn't really cite that the Easter Table Chronicle is given the letter [I] because of the Rolls edition's A through F letters; he only says this for G and H. I think this is obvious enough that it doesn't need to be cited. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks! Reference added to Commons as well. A455bcd9 (talk) 19:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

@Mike Christie and A455bcd9: - It looks like these issues have been resolved through citing or removing the uncited text. Is this article good to remove from WP:FARGIVEN and mark as satisfactory at WP:URFA/2020? Hog Farm _Talk 04:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for the reminder @Hog Farm: Done a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 07:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

• I read the article and can see no problems. Marked satisfactory. Desertarun (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC) [reply ]