Order embedding
In order theory, a branch of mathematics, an order embedding is a special kind of monotone function, which provides a way to include one partially ordered set into another. Like Galois connections, order embeddings constitute a notion which is strictly weaker than the concept of an order isomorphism. Both of these weakenings may be understood in terms of category theory.
Formal definition
[edit ]Formally, given two partially ordered sets (posets) {\displaystyle (S,\leq )} and {\displaystyle (T,\preceq )}, a function {\displaystyle f:S\to T} is an order embedding if {\displaystyle f} is both order-preserving and order-reflecting, i.e. for all {\displaystyle x} and {\displaystyle y} in {\displaystyle S}, one has
- {\displaystyle x\leq y{\text{ if and only if }}f(x)\preceq f(y).}[1]
Such a function is necessarily injective, since {\displaystyle f(x)=f(y)} implies {\displaystyle x\leq y} and {\displaystyle y\leq x}.[1] If an order embedding between two posets {\displaystyle S} and {\displaystyle T} exists, one says that {\displaystyle S} can be embedded into {\displaystyle T}.
Properties
[edit ]An order isomorphism can be characterized as a surjective order embedding. As a consequence, any order embedding f restricts to an isomorphism between its domain S and its image f(S), which justifies the term "embedding".[1] On the other hand, it might well be that two (necessarily infinite) posets are mutually order-embeddable into each other without being order-isomorphic.
An example is provided by the open interval {\displaystyle (0,1)} of real numbers and the corresponding closed interval {\displaystyle [0,1]}. The function {\displaystyle f(x)=(94x+3)/100} maps the former to the subset {\displaystyle (0.03,0.97)} of the latter and the latter to the subset {\displaystyle [0.03,0.97]} of the former, see picture. Ordering both sets in the natural way, {\displaystyle f} is both order-preserving and order-reflecting (because it is an affine function). Yet, no isomorphism between the two posets can exist, since e.g. {\displaystyle [0,1]} has a least element while {\displaystyle (0,1)} does not. For a similar example using arctan to order-embed the real numbers into an interval, and the identity map for the reverse direction, see e.g. Just and Weese (1996).[2]
A retract is a pair {\displaystyle (f,g)} of order-preserving maps whose composition {\displaystyle g\circ f} is the identity. In this case, {\displaystyle f} is called a coretraction, and must be an order embedding.[3] However, not every order embedding is a coretraction. As a trivial example, the unique order embedding {\displaystyle f:\emptyset \to \{1\}} from the empty poset to a nonempty poset has no retract, because there is no order-preserving map {\displaystyle g:\{1\}\to \emptyset }. More illustratively, consider the set {\displaystyle S} of divisors of 6, partially ordered by x divides y, see picture. Consider the embedded sub-poset {\displaystyle \{1,2,3\}}. A retract of the embedding {\displaystyle id:\{1,2,3\}\to S} would need to send {\displaystyle 6} to somewhere in {\displaystyle \{1,2,3\}} above both {\displaystyle 2} and {\displaystyle 3}, but there is no such place.
Additional perspectives
[edit ]Posets can straightforwardly be viewed from many perspectives, and order embeddings are basic enough that they tend to be visible from everywhere. For example:
- (Model theoretically) A poset is a set equipped with a (reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive) binary relation. An order embedding A → B is an isomorphism from A to an elementary substructure of B.
- (Graph theoretically) A poset is a (transitive, acyclic, directed, reflexive) graph. An order embedding A → B is a graph isomorphism from A to an induced subgraph of B.
- (Category theoretically) A poset is a (small, thin, and skeletal) category such that each homset has at most one element. An order embedding A → B is a full and faithful functor from A to B which is injective on objects, or equivalently an isomorphism from A to a full subcategory of B.
See also
[edit ]References
[edit ]- ^ a b c Davey, B. A.; Priestley, H. A. (2002), "Maps between ordered sets", Introduction to Lattices and Order (2nd ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–24, ISBN 0-521-78451-4, MR 1902334 .
- ^ Just, Winfried; Weese, Martin (1996), Discovering Modern Set Theory: The basics, Fields Institute Monographs, vol. 8, American Mathematical Society, p. 21, ISBN 9780821872475
- ^ Duffus, Dwight; Laflamme, Claude; Pouzet, Maurice (2008), "Retracts of posets: the chain-gap property and the selection property are independent", Algebra Universalis, 59 (1–2): 243–255, arXiv:math/0612458 , doi:10.1007/s00012-008-2125-6, MR 2453498, S2CID 14259820 .