Grothendieck spectral sequence
In mathematics, in the field of homological algebra, the Grothendieck spectral sequence, introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in his Tôhoku paper, is a spectral sequence that computes the derived functors of the composition of two functors {\displaystyle G\circ F}, from knowledge of the derived functors of {\displaystyle F} and {\displaystyle G}. Many spectral sequences in algebraic geometry are instances of the Grothendieck spectral sequence, for example the Leray spectral sequence.
Statement
[edit ]If {\displaystyle F\colon {\mathcal {A}}\to {\mathcal {B}}} and {\displaystyle G\colon {\mathcal {B}}\to {\mathcal {C}}} are two additive and left exact functors between abelian categories such that both {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}} and {\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}} have enough injectives and {\displaystyle F} takes injective objects to {\displaystyle G}-acyclic objects, then for each object {\displaystyle A} of {\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}} there is a spectral sequence:
- {\displaystyle E_{2}^{pq}=({\rm {R}}^{p}G\circ {\rm {R}}^{q}F)(A)\Longrightarrow {\rm {R}}^{p+q}(G\circ F)(A),}
where {\displaystyle {\rm {R}}^{p}G} denotes the p-th right-derived functor of {\displaystyle G}, etc., and where the arrow '{\displaystyle \Longrightarrow }' means convergence of spectral sequences.
Five term exact sequence
[edit ]The exact sequence of low degrees reads
- {\displaystyle 0\to {\rm {R}}^{1}G(FA)\to {\rm {R}}^{1}(GF)(A)\to G({\rm {R}}^{1}F(A))\to {\rm {R}}^{2}G(FA)\to {\rm {R}}^{2}(GF)(A).}
Examples
[edit ]The Leray spectral sequence
[edit ]If {\textstyle X} and {\textstyle Y} are topological spaces, let {\textstyle {\mathcal {A}}=\mathbf {Ab} (X)} and {\textstyle {\mathcal {B}}=\mathbf {Ab} (Y)} be the category of sheaves of abelian groups on {\textstyle X} and {\textstyle Y}, respectively.
For a continuous map {\displaystyle f\colon X\to Y} there is the (left-exact) direct image functor {\displaystyle f_{*}\colon \mathbf {Ab} (X)\to \mathbf {Ab} (Y)}. We also have the global section functors
- {\displaystyle \Gamma _{X}\colon \mathbf {Ab} (X)\to \mathbf {Ab} } and {\displaystyle \Gamma _{Y}\colon \mathbf {Ab} (Y)\to \mathbf {Ab} .}
Then since {\displaystyle \Gamma _{Y}\circ f_{*}=\Gamma _{X}} and the functors {\displaystyle f_{*}} and {\displaystyle \Gamma _{Y}} satisfy the hypotheses (since the direct image functor has an exact left adjoint {\displaystyle f^{-1}}, pushforwards of injectives are injective and in particular acyclic for the global section functor), the sequence in this case becomes:
- {\displaystyle H^{p}(Y,{\rm {R}}^{q}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}})\implies H^{p+q}(X,{\mathcal {F}})}
for a sheaf {\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}} of abelian groups on {\displaystyle X}.
Local-to-global Ext spectral sequence
[edit ]There is a spectral sequence relating the global Ext and the sheaf Ext: let F, G be sheaves of modules over a ringed space {\displaystyle (X,{\mathcal {O}})}; e.g., a scheme. Then
- {\displaystyle E_{2}^{p,q}=\operatorname {H} ^{p}(X;{\mathcal {E}}xt_{\mathcal {O}}^{q}(F,G))\Rightarrow \operatorname {Ext} _{\mathcal {O}}^{p+q}(F,G).}[1]
This is an instance of the Grothendieck spectral sequence: indeed,
- {\displaystyle R^{p}\Gamma (X,-)=\operatorname {H} ^{p}(X,-)}, {\displaystyle R^{q}{\mathcal {H}}om_{\mathcal {O}}(F,-)={\mathcal {E}}xt_{\mathcal {O}}^{q}(F,-)} and {\displaystyle R^{n}\Gamma (X,{\mathcal {H}}om_{\mathcal {O}}(F,-))=\operatorname {Ext} _{\mathcal {O}}^{n}(F,-)}.
Moreover, {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}om_{\mathcal {O}}(F,-)} sends injective {\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}}-modules to flasque sheaves,[2] which are {\displaystyle \Gamma (X,-)}-acyclic. Hence, the hypothesis is satisfied.
Derivation
[edit ]We shall use the following lemma:
Lemma—If K is an injective complex in an abelian category C such that the kernels of the differentials are injective objects, then for each n,
- {\displaystyle H^{n}(K^{\bullet })}
is an injective object and for any left-exact additive functor G on C,
- {\displaystyle H^{n}(G(K^{\bullet }))=G(H^{n}(K^{\bullet })).}
Proof: Let {\displaystyle Z^{n},B^{n+1}} be the kernel and the image of {\displaystyle d:K^{n}\to K^{n+1}}. We have
- {\displaystyle 0\to Z^{n}\to K^{n}{\overset {d}{\to }}B^{n+1}\to 0,}
which splits. This implies each {\displaystyle B^{n+1}} is injective. Next we look at
- {\displaystyle 0\to B^{n}\to Z^{n}\to H^{n}(K^{\bullet })\to 0.}
It splits, which implies the first part of the lemma, as well as the exactness of
- {\displaystyle 0\to G(B^{n})\to G(Z^{n})\to G(H^{n}(K^{\bullet }))\to 0.}
Similarly we have (using the earlier splitting):
- {\displaystyle 0\to G(Z^{n})\to G(K^{n}){\overset {G(d)}{\to }}G(B^{n+1})\to 0.}
The second part now follows. {\displaystyle \square }
We now construct a spectral sequence. Let {\displaystyle A^{0}\to A^{1}\to \cdots } be an injective resolution of A. Writing {\displaystyle \phi ^{p}} for {\displaystyle F(A^{p})\to F(A^{p+1})}, we have:
- {\displaystyle 0\to \operatorname {ker} \phi ^{p}\to F(A^{p}){\overset {\phi ^{p}}{\to }}\operatorname {im} \phi ^{p}\to 0.}
Take injective resolutions {\displaystyle J^{0}\to J^{1}\to \cdots } and {\displaystyle K^{0}\to K^{1}\to \cdots } of the first and the third nonzero terms. By the horseshoe lemma, their direct sum {\displaystyle I^{p,\bullet }=J\oplus K} is an injective resolution of {\displaystyle F(A^{p})}. Hence, we found an injective resolution of the complex:
- {\displaystyle 0\to F(A^{\bullet })\to I^{\bullet ,0}\to I^{\bullet ,1}\to \cdots .}
such that each row {\displaystyle I^{0,q}\to I^{1,q}\to \cdots } satisfies the hypothesis of the lemma (cf. the Cartan–Eilenberg resolution.)
Now, the double complex {\displaystyle E_{0}^{p,q}=G(I^{p,q})} gives rise to two spectral sequences, horizontal and vertical, which we are now going to examine. On the one hand, by definition,
- {\displaystyle {}^{\prime \prime }E_{1}^{p,q}=H^{q}(G(I^{p,\bullet }))=R^{q}G(F(A^{p}))},
which is always zero unless q = 0 since {\displaystyle F(A^{p})} is G-acyclic by hypothesis. Hence, {\displaystyle {}^{\prime \prime }E_{2}^{n}=R^{n}(G\circ F)(A)} and {\displaystyle {}^{\prime \prime }E_{2}={}^{\prime \prime }E_{\infty }}. On the other hand, by the definition and the lemma,
- {\displaystyle {}^{\prime }E_{1}^{p,q}=H^{q}(G(I^{\bullet ,p}))=G(H^{q}(I^{\bullet ,p})).}
Since {\displaystyle H^{q}(I^{\bullet ,0})\to H^{q}(I^{\bullet ,1})\to \cdots } is an injective resolution of {\displaystyle H^{q}(F(A^{\bullet }))=R^{q}F(A)} (it is a resolution since its cohomology is trivial),
- {\displaystyle {}^{\prime }E_{2}^{p,q}=R^{p}G(R^{q}F(A)).}
Since {\displaystyle {}^{\prime }E_{r}} and {\displaystyle {}^{\prime \prime }E_{r}} have the same limiting term, the proof is complete. {\displaystyle \square }
Notes
[edit ]- ^ Godement 1973, Ch. II, Theorem 7.3.3.
- ^ Godement 1973, Ch. II, Lemma 7.3.2.
References
[edit ]- Godement, Roger (1973), Topologie algébrique et théorie des faisceaux, Paris: Hermann, MR 0345092
- Weibel, Charles A. (1994), An introduction to homological algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 38, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-55987-4, MR 1269324, OCLC 36131259
Computational Examples
[edit ]- Sharpe, Eric (2003). Lectures on D-branes and Sheaves (pages 18–19), arXiv:hep-th/0307245
This article incorporates material from Grothendieck spectral sequence on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.