In re Debs
Find sources: "In re Debs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2021)
In re Debs | |
---|---|
Argued March 25–26, 1895 Decided May 27, 1895 | |
Full case name | In re Eugene V. Debs, Petitioner |
Citations | 158 U.S. 564 (more ) 15 S. Ct. 900; 39 L. Ed. 1092; 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2279 |
Holding | |
The court ruled that the government had a right to regulate interstate commerce and ensure the operations of the Postal Service, along with a responsibility to "ensure the general welfare of the public." | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Brewer, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Commerce Clause |
In re Debs, 158 U.S. 564 (1895), was a labor law case of the United States Supreme Court, which upheld a contempt of court conviction against Eugene V. Debs. Debs had the American Railway Union continue its 1894 Pullman Strike in violation of a federal injunction ordering labor unions back to work. The Supreme Court held that the federal government's Commerce Clause authority includes the ability to regulate the labor conditions of railways.
Background
[edit ]Eugene V. Debs, president of the American Railway Union, had been involved in the Pullman Strike earlier in 1894 and challenged the federal injunction ordering the strikers back to work where they would face being fired. The injunction had been issued because of the violent nature of the strike. However, Debs refused to end the strike and was subsequently cited for contempt of court; he appealed the decision to the courts.
The main question being debated was whether the federal government had a right to issue the injunction, which dealt with both interstate and intrastate commerce and shipping on rail cars.
Judgment
[edit ]Justice David Josiah Brewer held, for a unanimous court, in favor of the U.S. government. Joined by Chief Justice Melville Fuller and Associate Justices Stephen Johnson Field, John Marshall Harlan, Horace Gray, Henry Billings Brown, George Shiras, Jr., Howell Edmunds Jackson, and Edward Douglass White, the court ruled that the government had a right to regulate interstate commerce and ensure the operations of the Postal Service, along with a responsibility to "ensure the general welfare of the public." The decision slowed the momentum of labor unions. Debs would go on to lose another Supreme Court case in Debs v. United States .
Significance
[edit ]In Loewe v. Lawlor the Supreme Court stated that unions were in fact potentially liable for antitrust violations. In response, Congress passed the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 to take unions out of antitrust law.
See also
[edit ]Notes
[edit ]References
[edit ]- Papke, David Ray. (1999) The Pullman Case: The Clash of Labor and Capital in Industrial America. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas ISBN 0-7006-0954-7
External links
[edit ]- Works related to In re Debs at Wikisource
- Text of In re Debs, 158 U.S. 564 (1895) is available from: Justia Library of Congress WorldLII
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
- United States Constitution Article One case law
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Commerce Clause case law
- United States labor case law
- 1895 in United States case law
- Rail transportation labor disputes in the United States
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court
- Eugene V. Debs
- United States Supreme Court stubs