Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source . Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR
(April 2018)
1908 United States Supreme Court case
Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n
Argued January 31, 1908
Decided February 24, 1908
Full case nameDun v. Lumbermen's Credit Association
Citations209 U.S. 20 (more )
28 S. Ct. 335; 52 L. Ed. 663
Holding
The existence of some copyright-infringing information in a rote reference work does not entitle the original author to seek an injunction against the printing the later article when the later article's contents demonstrate significant original work.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · William H. Moody
Case opinion
MajorityMoody, joined by a unanimous court

Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n, 209 U.S. 20 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the existence of some copyright-infringing information in a rote reference work does not entitle the original author to seek an injunction against the printing the later article when the later article's contents demonstrate significant original work.[1]

References

[edit ]
  1. ^ Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n, 209 U.S. 20 (1908).
[edit ]
U.S. Supreme Court Article I case law
Presentment Clause of Section VII
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
Others
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
Copyright Act of 1976
Other copyright cases
Other patent cases
Other trademark cases
No Bills of Attainder or Ex post facto Laws Clause of Section IX
Legal Tender Cases
Others
Compact Clause of Section X
Stub icon

This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Fuller Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /