Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Draft talk:Source Four

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Entertainment Technology (inactive)
WikiProject icon This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Entertainment Technology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .Entertainment TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject Entertainment TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject Entertainment TechnologyEntertainment Technology
WikiProject icon Stagecraft (inactive)
WikiProject icon This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft
WikiProject icon Theatre
WikiProject icon This draft is part of WikiProject Theatre , a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the draft attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
WikiProject icon Film
WikiProject icon This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Film . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

No COF

[edit ]

I do not have any affiliation with ETC Hugtrain (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

However I do need a lot more independent sources Hugtrain (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

This is a Noteworthy Subject

[edit ]

The Source Four is a very popular light fixture in America. Almost any theater you walk into today will have these lights.

The previous article of the same name was deleted last year for being "unnoteworthy". I believe that the article was, in fact, promotional sounding, but I do not believe this warranted the entire deletion of it.

Yes, there are some primary sources and periodicals, but what do you expect? The New York Times writing a front page article about a stage lighting instrument? This isn't a random rock I found on the beach that I'm trying to pass off as important, it's a piece of history buried beneath some dirt that I'd like to preserve.

Please consider this before you make any quick judgment. Hugtrain (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /