Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia noticeboard for reporting blatant violations of the username policy
Usernames for administrator attention
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
- Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
- Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
- Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
- For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information , please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
- Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username }} or {{Uw-coi-username }} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
- Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
- Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149 ; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.
This page was last updated at 15:44 on 2 August 2026 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Bot-reported
[edit ]- TheOfficialXypher (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Information Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 23:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaug (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "40chars" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Information Note on file Username exceeds 40 characters. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- JpAbloGimenez (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "(blog|website)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Information Note on file suggests affiliation with a website -- DQB (owner / report) 05:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. (Non-administrator comment) — SimpleObjects-9ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 (see talk) 15:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Broskibidicommanderofgreatcomm (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "skibidi" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- MarketingCialfo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Promotional? 1" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Information Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
User-reported
[edit ]- Jsmooldaboss1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:J-SMOOL DA BOSS and User:Jsmooldaboss1. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Not a violation of the username policy.. User's name is not a company or organization, just advertising his art. Spammy pages removed. User warned. -- Alexf (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- NepalAviation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Frost 07:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Apparently an aviation enthusiast, not a business etc., but sometimes the line between the two is fuzzy. I'll try to remember to check back later. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- VPC - Premium Transfer & Tours Salzburg (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. SimpleObjects-9ei 🏖️/☀️/🥵 (see talk) 15:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply
- Being discussed with the user. User has no edit history. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC) reply