2
\$\begingroup\$

I'm looking for an easy solution to identify data formats, protocols. I have an outdoor temperature - humidity sensor which is connected to my HVAC system. I want to decode the data coming back from the sensor into another processor. I do not know the format - protocol and can not get any documentation from Honeywell. Short of buying a protocol analyzer are there any software solutions out there? Example 40F-53% humidity is an example of 40 deg. F with 53% humidity.

Trygve Laugstøl
1,4102 gold badges19 silver badges28 bronze badges
asked Aug 18, 2011 at 14:28
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you give us the sensor part #? Perhaps someone here has already decoded it or the sensor datasheet might mention the protocol format. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 18, 2011 at 16:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ It is the Honeywell DG115EZIAQ TrueIAQ control with sensor system. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 18, 2011 at 17:28

2 Answers 2

5
\$\begingroup\$

Like jpc says, you have to know what the protocol is the use a protocol analyzer. Most protocol analyzers are rather generic, so it may be hard to find an analyzer that decodes a possibly proprietary protocol.
What I do in a case like this is have a look for specifics in the first screenshot you have. What I find striking is that there are a few very narrow pulses, which will probably 1 bit-time wide, but then most other pulses are several multiples of this, so that would be longer sequences of 1s or 0s. That's odd, but may be noteworthy.

Next step: make more measurements and compare them. Are there partial sequences which return every time? If yes, these could be preambles and postambles defining data frames.
When looking in a data frame it's time to guesstimate. Write down what bit sequence the data could represent, just guessing and using your imagination. If you have a measurement just slightly differing from the previous one, like 41° instead of 40°, that's a good opportunity to look where this shows in the pattern. If the leftmost part is the same, but at the right it looks different, then humidity will be sent first, and maybe also MSB first (Most Significant Bit).
From now on it very much depends on what kind of correlations you can find. I would look for the wide pulses, because I'm a bit puzzled by them. Do they really represent for instance 8 consecutive 1 bits like I presumed based on the narrowest bit? If yes, you would expect to see these pulses to be broken sometimes, having some 0s in them. If it never changes they may represent the highest order bits in a 16-bit word (or longer), which may only change if you're going beyond 100°.

That's all I can say without having more samples. I hope it's a start.

answered Aug 18, 2011 at 16:11
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ I guess there is no other options but the long way around. I was hoping for a software solution that would aid in waveform comparison at least. I have other samples, and yes there are Consistencies. Thanks for your ideas! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 18, 2011 at 17:37
3
\$\begingroup\$

A protocol analyzer will not help if you do not know what protocol it is (and it may be proprietary).

Reverse engineering serial protocols is a little tedious but also offers lots of fun and satisfaction (if you get it right).

If there are no more wires going between the devices then chances are that this is a standard asynchronous serial transmission (UART, RS232). Look out for the 9-bit variations which are sometimes popular in embedded systems.

A logic analyzer (like the Saleae Logic) may be better suited for this job then an oscilloscope but either way it ultimately is up to you to figure it out.

answered Aug 18, 2011 at 14:55
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, I was hoping someone may have done this with software at some time. It is a simple two wire system that caries DC (24V) power with the data riding on it. However with the infinite possibilities of things like crc, parity, and so forth, I don't know that its going to be worth the effort. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 18, 2011 at 15:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ +1 for the Logic. It's affordable, easy to use, and has built in analyzers for common protocols. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 12:49

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.