Codeberg/Design
Archived
23
51
Fork
You've already forked Design
4

Navbar text too small #39

Closed
opened 2021年07月29日 14:13:07 +02:00 by mray · 21 comments
Collaborator
Copy link

I remember this being a result of other issues – still I want to keep an issue as a reminder this is still problematic. I also know this might become obsolete with a new header, in that case it can just be closed :P

The main menu text is too small.

I know the navbar holds much text, which is problematic on smaller screens but should be changed, too.

Possible text tweaks that can help:

"Documentation" -> "Docs"
"Join Codeberg e.V." -> "Join"
Codeberg Issues -> (Why have Codeberg issues and Issues in the main nav?)

I remember this being a result of other issues – still I want to keep an issue as a reminder this is still problematic. I also know this might become obsolete with a new header, in that case it can just be closed :P The main menu text is too small. I know the navbar holds much text, which is problematic on smaller screens but should be changed, too. Possible text tweaks that can help: "Documentation" -> "Docs" "Join Codeberg e.V." -> "Join" Codeberg Issues -> (Why have Codeberg issues and Issues in the main nav?)
Collaborator
Copy link

For 'Codeberg Issues' could we change it to 'Help'? This would make it distinct from issues and make it obvious that you can go there to report stuff and get help.

For 'Codeberg Issues' could we change it to 'Help'? This would make it distinct from issues and make it obvious that you can go there to report stuff and get help.
Author
Collaborator
Copy link

Sound good to me:

"Codeberg Issues" -> "Help"

Sound good to me: "Codeberg Issues" -> "Help"
Owner
Copy link

Hmm, looking at the PR Codeberg/Gitea#21 which removed the Help link from the user dropdown:

Why don't we make more us of that? Like, why do we always need to link to the Codeberg Issues and the Documentation and Donate + join all the time? We could also consider moving this to the dropdown instead, or some of it.

Hmm, looking at the PR Codeberg/Gitea#21 which removed the Help link from the user dropdown: Why don't we make more us of that? Like, why do we always need to link to the Codeberg Issues and the Documentation and Donate + join all the time? We could also consider moving this to the dropdown instead, or some of it.
Collaborator
Copy link

That's a good idea.

What about taking it one step further: having a drop-down next to the Codeberg logo with a list of Codeberg-related links. Essentially it would be Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea#17 but simpler and native to Gitea.

That's a good idea. What about taking it one step further: having a drop-down next to the Codeberg logo with a list of Codeberg-related links. Essentially it would be Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea#17 but simpler and native to Gitea.
Author
Collaborator
Copy link

This thread is getting a bit off topic: all I'm bringing up is a change similar to that:

image

There is much more we can do to improve the navigation, maybe track that elsewhere?

@ moving Codeberg links to submenus:
I think we should hold on to one condition at ALL TIMES;
There needs to be one obvious link on any given page at any given time on codeberg that enables members/users/visitors to support the project. This typically is somewhere in the top right.

We should not make it hard for people to help. And we should be humble but honest about the fact that we depend on money that does not come from google or microsoft.

This thread is getting a bit off topic: all I'm bringing up is a change similar to that: ![image](/attachments/4fa5cade-e766-45b2-addd-5cd578993777) There is much more we can do to improve the navigation, maybe track that elsewhere? @ moving Codeberg links to submenus: I think we should hold on to one condition at ALL TIMES; There needs to be one _obvious_ link on any given page at any given time on codeberg that enables members/users/visitors to support the project. This typically is somewhere in the top right. We should not make it hard for people to help. And we should be humble but honest about the fact that we depend on money that does not come from google or microsoft.
102 KiB
Owner
Copy link

well, I don't think we should dive too much into styling (sounds at least hard to me, but I'm no designer). A new navbar design can be discussed at Moritz and the big PR.

I think this is about a hotfix to improve text readability and lighten the navbar a little, so at least by shortening the names, and maybe by using native Gitea menues (not a hard job).

What about

  • Help > Link to the docs (always visible), mention the Issue tracker and chats there, too
  • Codeberg (dropdown) v
    • Issues
    • Donate
    • Blog
    • Join / Support

I don't think the donate button must always be visible. People won't donate more often because of this IMHO. Those who can afford, will probably join Codeberg and be done with it. It's just a waste of space.

Asking for donations must happen more actively IMO, but that's a different matter.

My structure above thinks that

  • there should always be a link to get help
  • the docs can be styled more freely, with a getting started, mentioning community channels like Matrix and of course the issue tracker. Pointing people to the issue tracker doesn't give them a first-aid.
well, I don't think we should dive too much into styling (sounds at least hard to me, but I'm no designer). A new navbar design can be discussed at Moritz and the big PR. I think this is about a hotfix to improve text readability and lighten the navbar a little, so at least by shortening the names, and maybe by using native Gitea menues (not a hard job). What about - Help > Link to the docs (always visible), mention the Issue tracker and chats there, too - Codeberg (dropdown) v - Issues - Donate - Blog - Join / Support I don't think the donate button must always be visible. People won't donate more often because of this IMHO. Those who can afford, will probably join Codeberg and be done with it. It's just a waste of space. Asking for donations must happen more actively IMO, but that's a different matter. My structure above thinks that - there should always be a link to get help - the docs can be styled more freely, with a getting started, mentioning community channels like Matrix and of course the issue tracker. Pointing people to the issue tracker doesn't give them a first-aid.
Collaborator
Copy link

I modified Codeberg/Gitea#21 for the dropdown and it should look something like this:

Now all that's left is to write up the Docs article.

I modified Codeberg/Gitea#21 for the dropdown and it should look something like this: ![](https://codeberg.org/attachments/541ce778-f52c-4a3a-8535-dfc8b201b46f) Now all that's left is to write up the Docs article.

I think after Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea#81 got merged we can close this

I think after https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea/pulls/81 got merged we can close this
Owner
Copy link

The navbar shortening has happened. We can now talk about changing the font size and / or applying more styling short-term.

The navbar shortening has happened. We can now talk about changing the font size and / or applying more styling short-term.
Collaborator
Copy link

I think a first step would be to revert the Codeberg-specific tweaks that make the navbar small. With some quick inspect element it looks like it wouldn't break the navbar on small screens.

I think a first step would be to revert the Codeberg-specific tweaks that make the navbar small. With some quick inspect element it looks like it wouldn't break the navbar on small screens.

Just wanted to mention, that I did not find the docs. There is at least a small triangle at the help button missing so one knows it`s a drop down menue.

Just wanted to mention, that I did not find the docs. There is at least a small triangle at the help button missing so one knows it`s a drop down menue.
Member
Copy link

I am somewhat worried that "community issue tracker", "join Codeberg e.V." and "donate to our cause" involve some friction to be discovered. Ease of use, being approachable in case of issues, and gathering support are very important.

I am somewhat worried that "community issue tracker", "join Codeberg e.V." and "donate to our cause" involve some friction to be discovered. Ease of use, being approachable in case of issues, and gathering support are very important.
Owner
Copy link

Now that the design change is live, I dislike the help icon. It looked ugly to me with the dropdown arrow next to it, but it also feels a little misplaced in terms of spacing to me.

Also, people don't really discovered it. What about moving the three links to the Codeberg dropdown, too? Also further shortening the navbar a little? I think this is easier to find.

We could use a separator like in the user dropdown to separate interactive parts and supportive links or something.

@hw do you think that donations will cease? I mean, people will probably still use and look at the Codeberg dropdown. Also, my wild guess would be that specific calls to donations are more effective?

Now that the design change is live, I dislike the help icon. It looked ugly to me with the dropdown arrow next to it, but it also feels a little misplaced in terms of spacing to me. Also, people don't really discovered it. What about moving the three links to the Codeberg dropdown, too? Also further shortening the navbar a little? I think this is easier to find. We could use a separator like in the user dropdown to separate interactive parts and supportive links or something. @hw do you think that donations will cease? I mean, people will probably still use and look at the Codeberg dropdown. Also, my wild guess would be that specific calls to donations are more effective?

can we close this issue now?!?

can we close this issue now?!?
Owner
Copy link

hahaha, the issue is actually about the font size, so #39 (comment) (comment) is still relevant - offtopic talk about content has ended and we now can talk about Design. But this isn't my domain, so I'm only here to touch CSS if people tell me what to do ...

hahaha, the issue is actually about the font size, so https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Design/issues/39#issuecomment-247073 (comment) is still relevant - offtopic talk about content has ended and we now can talk about Design. But this isn't my domain, so I'm only here to touch CSS if people tell me what to do ...
Author
Collaborator
Copy link

Text in th navbar is still very small.
And left aligned, despite the effort of making it shorter.

All is still pretty similar to the first screenshot on #39

Needless to say I'd appreciate any CSS touching that brings us closer to the second image... ;)

Text in th navbar is still very small. And left aligned, despite the effort of making it shorter. All is still pretty similar to the first screenshot on [#39](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Design/issues/39#issuecomment-244392) Needless to say I'd appreciate any CSS touching that brings us closer to the second image... ;)
Owner
Copy link

Personally, I have objections to a centerred navbar. Positions of the icons will vary depending on login state and scren size. I think many people are used to where to click (e.g. top left - visit dashboard) and I make heavy use of this.

If this varies from day to day (window size, the machine I'm working on etc), I'd probably have much more trouble with this (my workflow is actually placing the mouse on the correct position while scrolling back up).

I'm not a CSS pro, but changing the font size should be easily feasible (and should be done :D), but I'd like to hear a second opinion on the centered navbar. What's the value for this change design-wise?

Personally, I have objections to a centerred navbar. Positions of the icons will vary depending on login state and scren size. I think many people are used to where to click (e.g. top left - visit dashboard) and I make heavy use of this. If this varies from day to day (window size, the machine I'm working on etc), I'd probably have much more trouble with this (my workflow is actually placing the mouse on the correct position while scrolling back up). I'm not a CSS pro, but changing the font size should be easily feasible (and should be done :D), but I'd like to hear a second opinion on the centered navbar. What's the value for this change design-wise?
Author
Collaborator
Copy link

timed out. probably won't fix.

timed out. probably won't fix.
Owner
Copy link

no, I'm on it, first task is moving the CSS from build-deploy-gitea to the Gitea theme and reverting some special fixes. But I'm having issues to understand some of the changes and there is some issue with referencing assets from build-deploy-gitea from the Gitea theme (as this isn't aware of assets that may be added later in the build chain).

no, I'm on it, first task is moving the CSS from build-deploy-gitea to the Gitea theme and reverting some special fixes. But I'm having issues to understand some of the changes and there is some issue with referencing assets from build-deploy-gitea from the Gitea theme (as this isn't aware of assets that may be added later in the build chain).
Author
Collaborator
Copy link

timed out. probably won't fix.

timed out. probably won't fix.
Owner
Copy link

We will resolve this when applying your new navbar, but as we commonly agreed on, we require the landing page and footer first.

We will resolve this when applying your new navbar, but as we commonly agreed on, we require the landing page and footer first.
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No Branch/Tag specified
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
Kind: Breaking
Kind: Bug
Kind: Documentation
Kind: Enhancement
Kind: Feature
Kind: Maintenance
Kind: Public Relations

Design relevant outside of Codeberg
Kind: Question
Kind: Security
Kind: Testing
Kind: Web Design
Part: Color Palette
Part: Design Kit

Codeberg Design Kit
Part: Fonts
Part: Logo
Part: Navbar

Codeberg's navigation bar
Part: Themes

Gitea themes
Priority: Critical

The priority is critical
Priority: High

The priority is high
Priority: Low

The priority is low
Priority: Medium

The priority is medium
Reviewed: Confirmed

Something has been confirmed
Reviewed: Duplicate

Something exists already
Reviewed: Invalid

Something was marked as invalid
Reviewed: Wontfix

Something won't be fixed
Status: Blocked
Status: Completed

Work is complete
Status: Help wanted
Status: In progress

Work is in progress
Status: Needs feedback

Feedback is needed
Status: Stale
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
6 participants Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Codeberg/Design#39
Reference in a new issue
Codeberg/Design
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?