next release (v1.15) preview #430

Be aware of:

• public static assets moved from root to /assets
• Use a generic markup class to display externally rendered files and diffs #15735
• User now kann set user fisibility to private
  -> https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/16271 (limit it to "public" & "limited")

Fix:

• #142
• #341
• #135 ?
• #163
• Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea#58
• #401
• #416
• #306
• #206
• #244
• #487
• #490

With the assets path change, all pointers need to be updated. I know of https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/blog/src/branch/master/pelicanconf.py#L9 - something else in addition to the Gitea templates (that are already updated)?

@rwa in the past, we just edited the post here to include the issues. Is the block / depends function easier to use?

I'm not sure if it's easier to use, it's just another way of visualisation.
I think when browsing through the downstream issues it's easier to understand that it is "blocked" by the release issue instead of a generic event that "the issue has been mentioned in another issue" which might not necessarily mean it will be solved.

The only true reason why i used this feature is that i didn't realize i can edit your post. 😁

the assets thing also means we have to move the robots.txt in build-deploy-gitea, as it currently only is available at /assets/robots.txt after an upgrade. Looks like we have to create a custom folder for it?
https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/search-engines-indexation/

https://codeberg-test.org/assets/robots.txt vs https://codeberg-test.org/robots.txt

@fnetX this sounds like a serious issue for all gitea installs :/

It should at least be prominently stated in the Changelog / Release Notes!

https://codeberg-test.org footer on codeberg-test still has the API link (was intentionally removed from previous versions, but might be useful?) and a link to the Gitea "Website" - something we might want to remove?

@fnetX I did add API link back intentionally - it was requested (Codeberg/build-deploy-gitea#58)

Ah ... yeah I know about this issue, didn't notice you acted on purpose :-)
Thank you ... so only removing this website link? Let's not forget this :-)