C'est expliqué sur le blog qui est toujours directement inaccessible. Vive les caches !
The version of Qt supported now is Qt 4. I’m going to skip Qt 5 and wait for Qt 5.1. Qt4 and Qt5 are compatible in many areas and porting to Qt5 should be easy in most of the cases. Unfortunately, this is not the case when you use X11-related stuff. Qt 5 removed many X11-related APIs and there are no direct equivalent methods. So the porting is not painless for desktop environments. In addition, some freedesktop.org specs are designed to work with X11 only, such as the EWMH/NETWM spec and Xsettings spec. To port to Wayland, these problems need to be solved first. Gnome and KDE guys will fix them so we can just wait. Then why Qt 5.1? Because Qt 5.1 added back the once-removed X11-related APIs. So porting from Qt 4 to Qt 5.1 should be the most smooth path. It takes time for distros to adopt Qt 5.1, though.
Cela répondra peut-être même à guid.
The capacity of the human mind for swallowing nonsense and spewing it forth in violent and repressive action has never yet been plumbed. -- Robert A. Heinlein
[^] # Re: Qt 4 dans un premier temps puis Qt 5.1 ensuite
Posté par téthis . En réponse au journal LXDE, Razor-qt et Qt (et GTK+). Évalué à 9. Dernière modification le 08 juillet 2013 à 18:39.
C'est expliqué sur le blog qui est toujours directement inaccessible. Vive les caches !
Cela répondra peut-être même à guid.
The capacity of the human mind for swallowing nonsense and spewing it forth in violent and repressive action has never yet been plumbed. -- Robert A. Heinlein