Tu as oublié de citer les lignes juste en dessous :
Aptitude is an Ncurses based FrontEnd to Apt, the debian package manager. Since it is text based, it is run from a terminal or a CLI (command line interface). Aptitude has a number of useful features, including:
* a mutt-like syntax for matching packages in a flexible manner
* mark packages as "automatically installed" or "manually installed" so that packages can be auto-removed when no longer required
* colorful preview of actions about to be taken
* dselect-like persistence of user actions
* the ability to retrieve and display the Debian changelog of most packages
* AptCLI-like (= apt-get + apt-cache) command line mode ("aptitude install foo")
* Score-based and (usually) smarter dependency resolver than apt-get
Sur le dernier point au moins, aptitude se démarque sensiblement d'APT
[^] # Re: APT vs Aptitude ?
Posté par dinomasque . En réponse au journal Frontend à Aptitude. Évalué à 2.
Tu as oublié de citer les lignes juste en dessous :
Aptitude is an Ncurses based FrontEnd to Apt, the debian package manager. Since it is text based, it is run from a terminal or a CLI (command line interface). Aptitude has a number of useful features, including:
* a mutt-like syntax for matching packages in a flexible manner
* mark packages as "automatically installed" or "manually installed" so that packages can be auto-removed when no longer required
* colorful preview of actions about to be taken
* dselect-like persistence of user actions
* the ability to retrieve and display the Debian changelog of most packages
* AptCLI-like (= apt-get + apt-cache) command line mode ("aptitude install foo")
* Score-based and (usually) smarter dependency resolver than apt-get
Sur le dernier point au moins, aptitude se démarque sensiblement d'APT
BeOS le faisait il y a 20 ans !