D'ailleurs pour continuer à prêcher pour ma paroisse, voici des raisons du développement de la bibliothèque panda pour python que je reproduis ici (http://pandas.pydata.org/#why-not-r)
First of all, we love open source R! It is the most widely-used open source environment for statistical modeling and graphics, and it provided some early inspiration for pandas features. R users will be pleased to find this library adopts some of the best concepts of R, like the foundational DataFrame (one user familiar with R has described pandas as “R data.frame on steroids”). But pandas also seeks to solve some frustrations common to R users:
R has barebones data alignment and indexing functionality, leaving much work to the user. pandas makes it easy and intuitive to work with messy, irregularly indexed data, like time series data. pandas also provides rich tools, like hierarchical indexing, not found in R;
R is not well-suited to general purpose programming and system development. pandas enables you to do large-scale data processing seamlessly when developing your production applications;
Hybrid systems connecting R to a low-productivity systems language like Java, C++, or C# suffer from significantly reduced agility and maintainability, and you’re still stuck developing the system components in a low-productivity language;
The “copyleft” GPL license of R can create concerns for commercial software vendors who want to distribute R with their software under another license. Python and pandas use more permissive licenses.
[^] # Re: R
Posté par Nonolapéro . En réponse à la dépêche Scilab version 5.4.0. Évalué à 2.
D'ailleurs pour continuer à prêcher pour ma paroisse, voici des raisons du développement de la bibliothèque panda pour python que je reproduis ici (http://pandas.pydata.org/#why-not-r)