• # PHP 806

    Posté par (site web personnel, Mastodon) . En réponse à la dépêche Le colonel Moutarde, sur la table (de hachage), avec un livre de maths. Évalué à 6.

    ./Zend/zend_hash.h:228

    /*
     * DJBX33A (Daniel J. Bernstein, Times 33 with Addition)
     *
     * This is Daniel J. Bernstein's popular `times 33' hash function as
     * posted by him years ago on comp.lang.c. It basically uses a function
     * like ``hash(i) = hash(i-1) * 33 + str[i]''. This is one of the best
     * known hash functions for strings. Because it is both computed very
     * fast and distributes very well.
     *
     * The magic of number 33, i.e. why it works better than many other
     * constants, prime or not, has never been adequately explained by
     * anyone. So I try an explanation: if one experimentally tests all
     * multipliers between 1 and 256 (as RSE did now) one detects that even
     * numbers are not useable at all. The remaining 128 odd numbers
     * (except for the number 1) work more or less all equally well. They
     * all distribute in an acceptable way and this way fill a hash table
     * with an average percent of approx. 86%. 
     *
     * If one compares the Chi^2 values of the variants, the number 33 not
     * even has the best value. But the number 33 and a few other equally
     * good numbers like 17, 31, 63, 127 and 129 have nevertheless a great
     * advantage to the remaining numbers in the large set of possible
     * multipliers: their multiply operation can be replaced by a faster
     * operation based on just one shift plus either a single addition
     * or subtraction operation. And because a hash function has to both
     * distribute good _and_ has to be very fast to compute, those few
     * numbers should be preferred and seems to be the reason why Daniel J.
     * Bernstein also preferred it.
     *
     *
     * -- Ralf S. Engelschall <rse@xxxx>
     */