• [^] # Re: Pilotes

    Posté par . En réponse au journal FreeBSD plus performant que GNU/Linux ?. Évalué à 2.

    Deuxième page de l'article phoronix :
    > "The test system was bearing NVIDIA GeForce graphics, which is important under FreeBSD. The proprietary NVIDIA graphics driver is the only viable graphics driver for BSD. As talked about on occasions in the past, the state of graphics drivers for *BSD is sad. Even the open-source graphics drivers used by Linux aren't all supported under FreeBSD due to the complexity with many of these open-source drivers migrating to living within the kernel and relying upon new interfaces for memory management and mode-setting. AMD provides no proprietary (Catalyst) driver support to FreeBSD, not even for their workstation graphics cards. As a result, that leaves NVIDIA and their BSD graphics driver as the only real solution for those needing accelerating graphics support. "

    Après, je ne me souviens pas avoir lu de choses à propos des effets de bureau. Si les effets de KDE étaient désactivés et qu'unity, en revanche, en utilise, je serai plutôt étonné de ne pas avoir un écart plus grand. Ces choses là n'ont jamais fait bon ménage avec la 3D chez moi. (et, comble de la régression : plus possible de lancer un programme SDL non opengl en plein écran sous Gnome 3...)