• [^] # Re: search

    Posté par . En réponse à la dépêche Vers une libération de l’Internet ?. Évalué à 5.

    Si tu pisses sur les RFC en t'attribuant un TLD faut pas venir pleurer qu'un jour ca se passe mal. Pas plus qu'en décidant unilatéralement d'utiliser un nom de domaine ou des IPs qui ne sont ni à toi, ni privées.

    C'est même écrit noir sur blanc, RFC 2606:

     For example, without guidance, a site might set up some local
     additional unused top level domains for testing of its local DNS code
     and configuration. Later, these TLDs might come into actual use on
     the global Internet. As a result, local attempts to reference the
     real data in these zones could be thwarted by the local test
     versions. Or test or example code might be written that accesses a
     TLD that is in use with the thought that the test code would only be
     run in a restricted testbed net or the example never actually run.
     Later, the test code could escape from the testbed or the example be
     actually coded and run on the Internet. Depending on the nature of
     the test or example, it might be best for it to be referencing a TLD
     permanently reserved for such purposes.
     To safely satisfy these needs, four domain names are reserved as
     listed and described below.
     .test
     .example
     .invalid
     .localhost